Advertisement

Complete Mesocolic Excision vs D2 Dissection for Right-Sided Colon Cancer


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in Journal of Clinical Oncology by Lu et al, the Chinese phase III RELARC trial showed no significant improvement in disease-free survival with complete mesocolic excision vs D2 lymph node dissection in patients with right-sided colon cancer.

As stated by the investigators, “…[complete mesocolic excision] is being increasingly used for the treatment of right-sided colon cancer, although there is still no strong evidence that [complete mesocolic excision] provides better long-term oncological outcomes than D2 dissection. The controversy is mainly regarding the survival benefit from extended lymph node dissection emphasized by [complete mesocolic excision].”

Study Details

In the multicenter open-label trial, 995 evaluable patients with stage T2–T4aNanyM0 or TanyN+M0 right-sided colon cancer were randomly assigned between January 2016 and December 2019 to undergo complete mesocolic excision (n = 495) or D2 dissection (n = 500). The primary outcome measure was 3-year disease-free survival.

Key Findings

Disease-free survival at 3 years was 86.1% in the complete mesocolic excision group vs 81.9% in the D2 group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54–1.02, P = .06).

Overall survival at 3 years was 94.7% in the complete mesocolic excision group vs 92.6% in the D2 group (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.43–1.16, P = .17).

The investigators concluded: “This trial failed to find evidence of superior [disease-free survival] outcome for [complete mesocolic excision] compared with standard D2 lymph node dissection in primary surgical excision of right-sided colon cancer. Standard D2 dissection should be the routine procedure for these patients. [Complete mesocolic excision] should only be considered in patients with obvious mesocolic lymph node involvement.”

Yi Xiao, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by the Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission and CAMS (Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences. For full disclosure of all study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement