Advertisement

Datopotamab Deruxtecan vs Docetaxel in Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic NSCLC


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Ahn et al, the phase III TROPION-Lung01 trial showed significantly improved progression-free survival—but not overall survival—with the TROP2-directed antibody-drug conjugate datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd) vs docetaxel in patients with pretreated advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Study Details

In the global open-label trial, 604 patients were randomly assigned between February 2021 and November 2022 to receive Dato-DXd at 6 mg/kg (n = 299) or docetaxel at 75 mg/m2 (n = 305) every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. For the Dato-DXd group vs docetaxel group, 78% vs 77% had nonsquamous histology, 41% vs 41% were White, and 40% vs 39% were Asian. The dual primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival 

Progression-Free and Overall Survival

Median follow-up for progression-free survival was 10.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.8–12.5 months) in the Dato-DXd group and 9.6 months (95% CI = 8.2–11.9 months) in the docetaxel group. Median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI = 4.2–5.6 months) in the Dato-DXd group vs 3.7 months (95% CI = 2.9–4.2 months) in the docetaxel group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62–0.91, P = .004). Among patients with nonsquamous tumors, median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI = 4.3–6.9 months) in the Dato-DXd group vs 3.6 months (95% CI = 2.9–4.2 months) in the docetaxel group (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.51–0.79).

KEY POINTS

  • Dato-DXd significantly improved progression-free survival vs docetaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer.
  • No significant benefit in overall survival was observed.

Median follow-up for overall survival was 23.1 months (95% CI = 22.0–24.8 months) in the Dato-DXd group and 23.1 months (95% CI = 21.7–24.2 months) in the docetaxel group. Median overall survival was 12.9 months (95% CI = 11.0–13.9 months) with Dato-DXd vs 11.8 months (95% CI = 10.1–12.8 months) with docetaxel (HR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.78–1.14, P = .530). Among patients with nonsquamous histology, median overall survival was 14.6 months (95% CI = 12.4–16.0 months) with Dato-DXd vs 12.3 months (95% CI = 10.7–14.0 months) with docetaxel (HR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.68–1.05). Among patients with squamous histology, median progression-free survival was 2.8 vs 3.9 months (HR = 1.41, 95% CI = 0.95–2.08), and median overall survival was 7.6 vs 9.4 months (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 0.91–1.92).

Adverse Events

Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25.6% of the Dato-DXd group and 42.1% of the docetaxel group; the most common adverse events included stomatitis (6.7%) and anemia (4.0%) in the Dato-DXd group and neutropenia (23.4%) and leukopenia (13.1%) in the docetaxel group. Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11.1% vs 12.8% of patients.

Treatment-related adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 8.1% vs 12.1%. Adjudicated any-grade drug-related interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis occurred in 8.8% vs 4.1%. Treatment-related death occurred in three patients (1%) in the Dato-DXd group, as a result of ILD/pneumonitis in two and sepsis in one, and in two patients (0.7%) in the docetaxel group, from ILD/pneumonitis and septic shock.

The investigators concluded: “Dato-DXd significantly improved [progression-free survival] versus docetaxel in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, driven by patients with nonsquamous histology. [Overall survival] showed a numerical benefit but did not reach statistical significance. No unexpected safety signals were observed.”

Jacob Sands, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, is the corresponding author of the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by Daiichi Sankyo. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement