As reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Icro Meattini, MD, and colleagues, 10-year follow-up of the Italian single-center APBI-IMRT-Florence trial showed no differences in ipsilateral recurrence or survival with accelerated partial-breast irradiation vs whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery among women with early-stage breast cancer. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation was associated with less toxicity and better cosmesis outcomes.
Outcomes at 5 years showed no significant differences between accelerated partial-breast irradiation and whole-breast irradiation in ipsilateral recurrence (the primary endpoint) or survival rates at 5 years, with significantly improved treatment-related toxicity and cosmetic results in the accelerated partial-breast irradiation group.
![Icro Meattini, MD](/media/14011908/52-meattini.jpg)
Icro Meattini, MD
Study Details
In the trial, 520 patients from the Radiation Oncology Unit of the University of Florence were randomly assigned between 2005 and 2013 to receive external-beam intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with accelerated partial-breast irradiation at 30 Gy in 5 once-daily fractions (n = 260) or whole-breast irradiation at 50 Gy in 25 fractions with a tumor bed boost of 10 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 260). More than 90% of patients were considered to be at low risk of recurrence.
Recurrence and Survival
Median follow-up was 10.7 years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of ipsilateral recurrence was 3.7% in the accelerated partial-breast irradiation group vs 2.5% in the whole-breast irradiation group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.56, P = .40). At 10 years, overall survival was 91.9% vs 91.9% (HR = 0.95, P = .86) and breast cancer–specific survival was 97.8% vs 96.7% (HR = 0.65, P = .45).
KEY POINTS
- No significant differences in ipsilateral recurrence or survival were observed for accelerated partial-breast irradiation vs whole-breast irradiation.
- Accelerated partial-breast irradiation was associated with less toxicity and a lower rate of adverse cosmetic outcomes.
For the accelerated partial-breast irradiation vs whole-breast irradiation groups, 10-year cumulative incidence rates were 3.7% vs 2.9% for locoregional recurrence (HR = 1.33, P = .58), 0.8% vs 3.2% for contralateral breast cancer (HR = 0.25, P = .08), and 2.9% vs 3.2% for distant metastasis (HR = 0.89, P = .83).
Toxicity and Cosmesis
The accelerated partial-breast irradiation group had significantly less acute (P = .0001) and late (P = .0001) treatment-related toxicity. The highest-grade acute toxicity was grade 1 in 19.1% and grade 2 in 2% of patients in the accelerated partial-breast irradiation group vs grade 1 in 28.8%, grade 2 in 31.2%, and grade 3 in 6.5% of patients in the whole-breast irradiation group. The highest-grade late toxicity was grade 1 in 4.5% of the accelerated partial-breast irradiation group vs grade 1 in 27.3% and grade 2 in 2.7% of the whole-breast irradiation group.
A greater proportion of patients in the whole-breast irradiation group had adverse (fair or poor) cosmesis outcomes as rated by both physicians (1.9% vs 0%, P = .0001) and patients (14.6% vs 0.8%, P = .0001).
The investigators concluded, “The 10-year cumulative ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence incidence in [patients with] early breast cancer treated with external accelerated partial-breast irradiation using IMRT technique in 5 once-daily fractions is low and not different from that after whole-breast irradiation. Acute and late treatment-related toxicity and cosmesis outcomes were significantly in favor of accelerated partial-breast irradiation.”
Dr. Meattini, of the University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.
Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.