A new clinical guideline from the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) provides recommendations on the use of radiation therapy to treat patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, including when radiation treatments are appropriate, as well as the optimal dosing, timing, and fractionation for these treatments. The guideline, which also outlines strategies to prevent and mitigate common side effects of pancreatic radiation therapy, was published by Palta et al in Practical Radiation Oncology.
Photo credit: Getty
Standard treatment for localized pancreatic cancer involves surgery to remove the tumor combined with radiation and/or chemotherapy prior to surgery and/or following surgery to target potential residual disease. Recent breakthroughs including new systemic therapies and the emergence of stereotactic radiation have driven significant changes in pancreatic cancer treatment, which led ASTRO to develop its first guideline on this topic.
"Historically, very high rates of distant metastatic disease with pancreas[tic] cancer have overshadowed its tendency to recur locally. In the past several years, newer systemic therapies are proving to be more effective at controlling this cancer when it spreads, and fewer people are dying from distant disease. This makes treatments like radiation to manage local disease more meaningful," explained Manisha Palta, MD, Co-Chair of the Guideline Task Force and a radiation oncologist at Duke University.
The guideline was based on a systematic literature review of 179 articles published from May 2007 through January 2017. The 14-member task force included a multidisciplinary team of radiation oncologists from a variety of practice settings, a medical physicist, a medical oncologist, a surgical oncologist, a radiation oncology resident, and a patient representative. The guideline was developed in collaboration with ASCO and the Society of Surgical Oncology.
KEY RECOMMENDATIONS
- In the adjuvant setting, conventionally fractionated radiation is recommended conditionally for patients with high-risk features such as positive lymph nodes and margins following surgical resection. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recommended only if the patient is enrolled in a clinical trial/data registry.
- In the neoadjuvant setting, conventionally fractionated radiation therapy or SBRT is recommended conditionally following chemotherapy for patients with resectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation (either conventional or stereotactic) is conditionally recommended following systemic therapy for select patients with borderline resectable disease.
- For patients with locally advanced disease who are not candidates for surgery, systemic chemotherapy followed by either chemoradiation or SBRT is recommended conditionally as an option for definitive treatment.
The ASTRO guideline covers four main areas: (1) the use of radiation in presurgical, postsurgical, definitive, and palliative treatment settings, (2) stereotactic vs conventional radiation therapy, (3) technical aspects of radiation therapy, and (4) mitigating common side effects. It emphasizes a patient-centered approach that integrates patients' values and preferences into treatment decisions and also stresses the importance of multidisciplinary consultations, planning, and follow-up.
Key Recommendations
In the adjuvant setting, conventionally fractionated radiation is recommended conditionally for patients with high-risk features such as positive lymph nodes and margins following surgical resection. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is recommended only if the patient is enrolled in a clinical trial or data registry.
In the neoadjuvant setting, conventionally fractionated radiation therapy or SBRT is recommended conditionally following chemotherapy for patients with resectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation (either conventional or stereotactic) is conditionally recommended following systemic therapy for select patients with borderline resectable disease.
For patients with locally advanced disease who are not candidates for surgery, systemic chemotherapy followed by either chemoradiation or SBRT is recommended conditionally as an option for definitive treatment.
Recommendations also address:
- Optimal dosing and fractionation for different subgroups of patients
- Sequencing of radiation with systemic chemotherapies in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and definitive settings
- Simulation and setup strategies, such as image guidance and patient-specific motion management
- Techniques for treatment planning and delivery, including a strong recommendation for the use of modulated radiation therapy to deliver treatment
- Treatment in the palliative setting, including a strong recommendation for palliative radiation therapy to either the primary tumor or select metastatic sites to help relieve pain and other symptoms.
Mitigating Side Effects
The guideline also addresses ways to mitigate side effects related to pancreatic radiation, whether given alone or with chemotherapy. While the side effects from radiation therapy depend on how the radiation is administered, the most common toxicities include fatigue and digestive/gastrointestinal effects such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.
The guideline strongly recommends that patients who undergo radiation treatments for pancreatic cancer be given prophylactic antinausea medicines. It also conditionally recommends the use of antacid or acid-reducing medications.
Dr. Palta explained how these medications are used preventatively with radiation: "If we know that certain side effects tend to occur with a relatively modest or high frequency—such as nausea and stomach pain—there are medications we can give to patients prior to treatment to help mitigate those side effects."
Emerging and Upcoming Data
The guideline comments on emerging and upcoming trial reports that will add to the evidence on stereotactic radiation and other aspects of pancreatic cancer treatment, and which subsequently will shape future clinical practice and guideline updates.
"Any patient who is diagnosed with pancreatic cancer deserves to have a multidisciplinary evaluation, where she or he can have nuanced conversations about the benefits and risks of different types of treatment based on the most current information available. It's also essential that any patient who might be an appropriate candidate for radiation have access to a radiation oncologist who can provide perspective on the pros and cons of treatment, so that the patient can make an informed decision," said Dr. Palta. “This is a rapidly evolving field and some potentially practice-changing studies that are not included in this guideline may become available in the relatively near-term future.”
Disclosures: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit practicalradonc.org.