Advertisement

Risk of Subsequent Neoplasms in Survivors of Childhood Neuroblastoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

In a Dutch study reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Westerveld et al identified long-term risks of subsequent neoplasms in 5-year survivors of childhood neuroblastoma.

Study Details

The study included data from 563 survivors in the Dutch Childhood Cancer Survivor Study–LATER cohort diagnosed between 1963 and 2014.

Key Findings

Overall, a subsequent malignant neoplasm developed in 23 survivors and a subsequent nonmalignant neoplasm developed in 60. After a median follow-up of 23.7 years (range = 5.0–56.3 years), survivors had an increased risk of subsequent malignant neoplasm vs the general population (standardized incidence ratio [SIR] = 4.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5–5.9; absolute excess risk = 15.1 cases/10,000 person-years). The 30-year cumulative incidence was 3.4% (95% CI = 1.9%-6.0%) for subsequent malignant neoplasms and 10.4% (95% CI = 7.3%–14.8%) for subsequent nonmalignant neoplasms.

Six survivors developed a subsequent malignant neoplasm after treatment with iodine-metaiodobenzylguanidine (I-131 MIBG) treatment. Compared with survivors who did not receive I-131 MIBG, those who did had an increased risk of subsequent malignant neoplasms (subdistribution hazard ratio [HR] = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.8–17.8) and subsequent nonmalignant neoplasms (subdistribution HR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.2–5.6). Risk associated with I-131 MIBG  treatment was attenuated among high-risk patients for subsequent malignant neoplasms (subdistribution HR = 3.6, 95% CI = 0.9–15.3) and subsequent nonmalignant neoplasms (subdistribution HR = 1.5, 95% CI = 0.7–3.6).

The investigators concluded: “Our results demonstrate that neuroblastoma survivors have an elevated risk of developing [subsequent malignant neoplasms] and a high risk of [subsequent nonmalignant neoplasms]. [I-131 MIBG] may be a treatment-related risk factor for the development of [subsequent malignant neoplasm] and [subsequent nonmalignant neoplasm], which needs further validation. Our results emphasize the need for awareness of subsequent neoplasms and the importance of follow-up care.”

Aimée S.R. Westerveld, MSc, of Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by the KiKa core funding of the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement