Advertisement

Addition of First-Line Dalpiciclib to Letrozole or Anastrozole in Hormone Receptor–Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer


Advertisement
Get Permission

In an interim analysis of a Chinese phase III trial (DAWNA-2) reported in The Lancet Oncology, Zhang et al found that the addition of the CDK4/6 inhibitor dalpiciclib to letrozole or anastrozole improved progression-free survival as first-line treatment in patients with advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.  

Study Details

In the multicenter double-blind trial, 456 patients were randomly assigned between July 2019 and December 2020 to receive dalpiciclib at 150 mg per day for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off (n = 303) or matching placebo (n = 153) in combination with either letrozole at 2.5 mg or anastrozole at 1 mg once daily continuously. Random assignment stratification factors included visceral metastasis, previous endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, and endocrine therapy partner. In the dalpiciclib group, 55% of patients received letrozole and 45% received anastrozole; in the control group, 54% received letrozole and 46% received anastrozole. Menopause status was postmenopausal in 60% of patients in the dalpiciclib group vs 65% of the control group, and premenopausal or perimenopausal in 40% vs 35%, respectively. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival.

Progression-Free Survival

At preplanned interim analysis, median progression-free survival was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 30.6 months to not reached) in the dalpiciclib group vs 18.2 months (95% CI = 16.5–22.5 months) in the control group (stratified hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.38–0.69, P < .0001).

KEY POINTS

  • The addition of dalpiciclib to letrozole or anastrozole significantly improved progression-free survival.
  • Median progression-free survival was 30.6 vs 18.2 months.

For progression-free survival, hazard ratios were: 0.53 (95% CI = 0.35–0.79) among patients receiving letrozole and 0.51 (95% CI = 0.34–0.78) among those receiving anastrozole; and 0.52 (95% CI = 0.36–0.75) among postmenopausal patients and 0.53 (95% CI = 0.33–0.85) among premenopausal or perimenopausal patients.

On investigator assessment, objective responses (partial responses in all but two patients) were achieved in 57% of the dalpiciclib group vs 48% of the control group. Median duration of response was not reached (95% CI = 26.9 months to not reached) vs 15.0 months (95% CI = 12.9–20.3 months). At time of analysis, death had occurred in 12% of the dalpiciclib group and 13% of the control group.

Adverse Events

Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 90% of patients in the dalpiciclib group vs 12% of the control group; the most commonly reported events in the dalpiciclib group were neutropenia (86% vs 0% in control group), leukopenia (67% vs 0%), and anemia (7% vs < 1%). Serious adverse events occurred in 12% vs 7% of patients. Dalpiciclib and placebo were discontinued due to adverse events in 4% vs 2% of patients. Two deaths in the dalpiciclib group—both due to unknown cause—were considered possibly related to treatment.

The investigators concluded, “Our findings suggest that dalpiciclib plus letrozole or anastrozole could be a novel standard first-line treatment for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, and is an alternative option to the current treatment landscape.”

Binghe Xu, MD, of the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, is the corresponding author for The Lancet Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences and Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit thelancet.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement