Advertisement

USPSTF Issues New Recommendation Statement on Colorectal Cancer Screening

Individuals at Average Risk Should Now Begin Screening at Age 45


Advertisement
Get Permission

Prompted by a rise in cases of colorectal cancer in people younger than 50, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended that individuals at average risk for the disease begin screening exams at age 45 instead of the traditional age of 50. The guideline changes, published in JAMAupdate the USPSTF’s 2016 recommendations and align them with those of the American Cancer Society, which lowered the age for initiation of screening to 45 in 2018.

Incidence of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most preventable malignancies, owing to its long natural history of progression and the availability of screening tests that can intercept and detect the disease early. Overall incidence of colorectal cancer in individuals aged 50 and older has declined steadily since the mid-1980s—largely because of increased screening and changing patterns of modifiable risk factors.

“A concerning increase in colorectal cancer incidence among younger individuals (ie, younger than 50; defined as young-onset colorectal cancer) has been documented since the mid-1990s, with 11% of colon cancers and 15% of rectal cancers in 2020 occurring among patients younger than 50 years, compared with 5% and 9%, respectively, in 2010,” said Kimmie Ng, MD, MPH, first author of an editorial in JAMA accompanying the USPSTF guidelines change. Dr. Ng is the Director of the Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Center at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.


[Lowering the recommended age to initiate screening] will make colorectal cancer screening, which is so important, available to millions more people in the United States, and hopefully many more lives will be saved by catching colorectal cancer earlier, as well as by preventing colorectal cancer.
— Kimmie Ng, MD, MPH

Tweet this quote

The causes of the increase in young-onset colorectal cancer aren’t currently known.

Lowering the recommended age to initiate screening “will make colorectal cancer screening, which is so important, available to millions more people in the United States, and hopefully many more lives will be saved by catching colorectal cancer earlier, as well as by preventing colorectal cancer,” said Dr. Ng.

More About the USPSTF and its Recommendations

The USPSTF is an independent panel of experts funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It systematically reviews the evidence of effectiveness of preventive services and develops recommendations. American health insurance groups are required to cover, at no charge to the patient, any service that the USPSTF recommends with a grade A or B level of evidence—regardless of how much it costs.

The task force recommendation means that insurers will be required to cover preventive procedures such as colonoscopies and stool tests designed to detect colon cancer in early stages.

The task force selected age 45 based on research showing that initiating screening at that age averted more early deaths than starting at age 50, with a relatively small increase in the number of colonoscopy complications. There is no change to the USPSTF 2016 recommendation to only selectively screen individuals aged 76 to 85, as research shows only small increases in life-years gained.

Editorial

The accompanying JAMA editorial asked rhetorically whether the age of screening should be lowered to even younger than age 45. While the majority of young-onset colorectal cancer diagnoses and deaths occurs in persons aged 45 to 49, the rate of increase in young-onset colorectal cancer is actually steepest in the very youngest patients. Colon cancer incidence is increasing by 2% per year in those aged 20 to 29, compared with 1.3% in those aged 40 to 49. Rectal cancer incidence is increasing by 3.2% per year in 20 to 29-year-olds and 30 to 39-year-olds, vs 2.3% in 40 to 49-year-olds.

“We are now seeing patients even younger than 45—in their 20s and 30s—who are being diagnosed with this cancer, and often at very late stages,” said Dr. Ng. “Clearly the USPSTF recommendation to start screening at age 45 will not be enough to catch those young people who are being diagnosed.”

Ultimately, optimal prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer in people younger than 45 will require further research into the underlying causes and risk factors of young-onset colorectal cancer, which have thus far remained elusive, said the editorial authors.

The authors also called for “bold steps” to translate the lowered age of beginning screening into meaningful decreases in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, noting that despite the preventive benefits of colorectal cancer screening, only 68.8% of eligible individuals in the United States undergo screening. The rate is lower among the uninsured and underinsured, those with low incomes, and racial and ethnic minorities. Barriers include lack of knowledge of the importance of screening, concerns about the invasive nature of colonoscopy, and lack of access to and provider recommendations for screening.

The editorial lists examples including public awareness campaigns (including those aimed at gaps in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality between Black and White Americans) and specific actions. Employers could provide 45-year-old employees with a paid “wellness day” to undergo colorectal cancer screening or offer day care or transportation vouchers to overcome the logistical hurdles of colonoscopies. Health systems could offer weekend or after-hours appointments for colonoscopies.

The new recommendation “represents an important policy change,” the authors wrote, “to drive progress toward reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality.”

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit jamanetwork.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement