Advertisement

High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma: Long-Term Outcomes With Maintenance Chemotherapy


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology by Gianni Bisogno, MD, PhD, and colleagues, long-term follow-up of the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group RMS2005 trial showed significant survival advantages with the use of maintenance chemotherapy in pediatric patients with high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

Gianni Bisogno, MD, PhD

Gianni Bisogno, MD, PhD

Study Details

In the international trial, patients were randomly assigned to discontinue treatment (standard group, n = 186) or receive maintenance chemotherapy with six 28-day cycles of vinorelbine at 25 mg/m2 once daily on days 1, 8, and 15, plus once-daily low-dose cyclophosphamide at 25 mg/m2 (maintenance group, n = 185). The initial report from the trial showed no significant difference in disease-free survival—the primary endpoint—between groups and an overall survival advantage for the maintenance group. The current report shows findings at a median follow-up of 114 months from randomization.  

Key Findings

The 10-year disease-free survival was 66.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 59%–74%) in the standard group vs 77.1% (95% CI = 70.3%–82.5%) in the maintenance group (P = .025).

The 10-year overall survival was 70.8% (95% CI = 63.3%–77.0%) in the standard group vs 82.9% (95% CI = 76.6%–87.7%) in the maintenance group (P = .0099). The 10-year event-free survival was 64.1% (95% CI = 56.4%–70.7%) in the standard group vs 76.6% (95% CI = 69.7%–82.0%) in the maintenance group (P =.01).

The investigators concluded: “Long-term results of the RMS2005 trial confirm the survival benefit of maintenance chemotherapy with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide for patients with high-risk RMS.”

Dr. Bisogno, of the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padua, Italy, is the corresponding author of the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Fondazione Cittá della Speranza, Alice’s Arc, and others. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement