Advertisement

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Low–Molecular-Weight Heparin in Preventing Recurrent VTE in Patients With Cancer


Advertisement
Get Permission

In the CANVAS study, reported in JAMA, Deb Schrag, MD, FASCO, MPH, and colleagues found that use of direct oral anticoagulants was noninferior to low–molecular-weight heparin in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer.

Study Details

In the open-label trial, 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiologic diagnosis of VTE at 67 U.S. oncology practices were randomly assigned between December 2016 and April 2020 to receive a direct oral anticoagulant (n = 335) or low–molecular-weight heparin (n = 366) and followed for 6 months.

Deb Schrag, MD, FASCO, MPH

Deb Schrag, MD, FASCO, MPH

Physicians and patients selected any direct oral anticoagulant or any low–molecular-weight heparin; physicians selected drug doses. The primary outcome measure was recurrent VTE rate at 6 months; noninferiority of direct oral anticoagulants vs low–molecular-weight heparin was defined as an upper limit of the 1-sided 95% confidence interval of < 3% for the difference among patients receiving at least one dose of the study drug.

Key Findings

A total of 330 patients in the direct oral anticoagulant group and 308 in the low–molecular-weight heparin group received at least one dose of the study drug. Rates of recurrent VTE at 6 months were 6.1% in the direct oral anticoagulant group vs 8.8% in the low–molecular-weight heparin group (difference = −2.7%, 1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] = −100% to 0.7%), satisfying the noninferiority criterion.

No significant differences were observed in other outcome measures. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of the direct oral anticoagulant group vs 5.6% of the low–molecular-weight heparin group (difference = −0.4%, 1-sided 95% CI = –100% to 2.5%). At 6 months, death occurred in 21.5% of patients in the direct oral anticoagulant group vs 18.4% of patients in the low–molecular-weight heparin group (difference = 3.1%, 1-sided 95% CI = −100% to 8.3%).

Adverse events, including VTE and bleeding, occurred in 36.0% of the direct oral anticoagulant group vs 38.7% of the low–molecular-weight heparin group (difference = −2.7%, 95% CI = −10.2% to 4.8%). Grade ≥ 3 anemia occurred in 3.0% vs 1.0% of patients.

The investigators concluded, “Among adults with cancer and VTE, direct oral anticoagulants were noninferior to low–molecular-weight heparin for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a direct oral anticoagulant to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.”

Dr. Schrag, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, is the corresponding author for the JAMA article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by a grant from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). For full disclosures of the study authors, visit jamanetwork.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement