Advertisement

Addition of First-Line Camrelizumab to Gemcitabine/Cisplatin in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

In an interim analysis of a Chinese phase III trial (CAPTAIN-1st) reported in The Lancet Oncology, Yang et al found that the addition of camrelizumab to gemcitabine and cisplatin significantly prolonged progression-free survival in the first-line treatment of recurrent or  metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Study Details

In the multicenter double-blind trial, 263 patients were randomly assigned between November 2018 and November 2019 to receive camrelizumab at 200 mg (n = 134) or placebo (n = 129) on day 1 plus gemcitabine at 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin at 80 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks for four to six cycles, followed by maintenance camrelizumab or placebo; treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by independent review committee. The significance threshold was P = .0086 for the prespecified interim analysis in June 2020.

KEY POINTS

  • The addition of camrelizumab to gemcitabine/cisplatin significantly prolonged progression-free survival.
  • At interim analysis, median progression-free survival was 9.7 vs 6.9 months.

Progression-Free Survival

Median follow-up at interim analysis was 10.2 months (interquartile range [IQR] = 7.7–12.7 months). Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.3–11.4 months) in the camrelizumab group vs 6.9 months (95% CI = 5.9–7.3 months) in the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.39–0.76, P = .0002).   

Objective response was observed in 87% (complete response in 5%) vs 81% of patients (complete response in 3%). Median duration of response was 8.5 months vs 5.6 months (HR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.37–0.79).

At an updated analysis (December 2020), median follow-up was 15.6 months (IQR = 12.3–19.2 months). Median progression-free survival was 10.8 months (95% CI = 8.5–13.6 months) in the camrelizumab group vs 6.9 months (95% CI = 5.9–7.9 months) in the control group (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.37–0.69), with 12- and 18-month rates of 45.8% vs 20.5% and 34.8% vs 12.7%. At the time of the updated analysis, overall survival data were not mature, with death having occurred in 21% vs 30% of patients; median overall survival was not reached in the camrelizumab group vs 22.6 months in the control group (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.41–1.11).

Adverse Events

At the time of the updated analysis, grade ≥ 3 adverse events had occurred in 94% of the camrelizumab group vs 91% of the control group, with the most common being decreased white blood cell count (66% vs 70%), decreased neutrophils (64% vs 66%), anemia (40% vs 44%), and decreased platelets (40% vs 40%). Serious adverse events occurred in 44% vs 37% of patients and were considered related to treatment in 36% vs 29% (most common = decreased platelets in 14% vs 16%). Adverse events led to discontinuation of any study treatment in 10% vs 5%. Treatment-related death occurred in five patients (4%) in the camrelizumab group, due to an unknown cause in two patients, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in one, pharyngeal hemorrhage in one, and arrhythmia in one; treatment-related death occurred in one patient (< 1%) in the control group, due to an unknown cause.

The investigators concluded: “Our findings suggest that camrelizumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin could be a new standard of care for patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the first-line setting. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm this conclusion.”

Li Zhang, MD, of Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Centre, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, is the corresponding author of The Lancet Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit www.thelancet.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement