Advertisement

Head and Neck Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy With 3-Weekly vs Weekly Cisplatin


Advertisement
Get Permission

In the long-term follow-up of a Japanese phase II/III trial (JCOG1008) reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Tahara et al found maintained noninferiority of chemoradiotherapy with weekly vs every-3-week cisplatin for overall survival in patients with postoperative high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Study Details

In the multicenter trial, 261 patients were randomly assigned to receive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin at 40 mg/m2 once weekly for seven cycles (n = 129) or cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for three cycles (n = 132). An interim analysis showed that chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin was noninferior in overall survival compared with chemoradiotherapy with 3-weekly cisplatin.

Key Findings

At final analysis, with a median follow-up of 5.6 years, 5-year overall survival was 58.7% in the 3-weekly group and 71.2% in the weekly group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52–1.12 [<1.32 noninferiority threshold]), confirming noninferiority of the weekly regimen.

Five-year relapse-free survival was 53.0% in the 3-weekly group vs 64.3% in the weekly group (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.57–1.16). Five-year local relapse-free survival was 57.2% vs 68.8% (HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.54–1.14).

No late adverse events of any grade showed more than a 10% difference between the two groups.

The investigators stated: “In conclusion, 5-year follow-up confirmed that chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin is noninferior in [overall survival] to chemoradiotherapy with 3-weekly cisplatin in patients with postoperative high-risk [locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck]. These results further support the use of weekly cisplatin plus radiotherapy as a reasonable alternative for this patient population.”

Makoto Tahara, MD, PhD, of National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

DISCLOSURE: The study was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund and others. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement