In some patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, downstaging of disease to within criteria that qualify the patient for a liver transplant leads to excellent 10-year posttransplant outcomes, according to new research published by Tabrizian et al in JAMA Surgery. The results validate current national policies around transplant eligibility.
Milan Criteria
Selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common form of liver cancer, for transplant has been guided for more than 2 decades by standards known as the Milan criteria. The Milan criteria state that transplantation should be performed in those with a single tumor measuring 5 cm or less in diameter or three tumors that are each 3 cm or less in diameter, have no macrovascular invasion, and no metastasis. Over time, the rising incidence of HCC and mortality rates in the United States have led to refinements to the selection policy, shifting the focus to guidelines that also incorporate tumor biology, response to bridging therapies, and waiting times for patients within and beyond the Milan criteria.
Downstaging
One aspect of the current criteria is known as downstaging: the process of applying liver-directed therapy to tumors too big for the Milan criteria with the hope of reducing them to the suggested size. Downstaging is now an option in selecting suitable liver transplant candidates with initial tumors that exceed the criteria. However, liver cancer can recur after transplantation, either within the liver or outside of the liver. The treatment options of patients who have recurrence posttransplantation is limited, and prognosis in these patients tends to be poor.
KEY POINTS
- The 10-year post-transplant survival and recurrence rates were, respectively, 52.1% and 20.6% among those whose disease was downstaged; 61.5% and 13.3% in those always within the criteria; and 43.3% and 41.1% in those whose disease was not downstaged.
- “Our study validates national policy on downstaging prior to transplantation and shows the clear utility benefit for transplantation prioritization decision-making,” commented the authors.
Current Study
In this cohort study, a retrospective multicenter analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted for 2,645 adults who had undergone liver transplant for HCC at five U.S. academic medical centers between January 2001 and December 2015; the analysis was performed from May 2019 through June 2021. Outcomes of 341 patients whose disease was downstaged to fit within the Milan criteria were compared with those in 2,122 patients whose disease always fit within the criteria and 182 patients whose disease was not downstaged.
The 10-year posttransplant survival and recurrence rates were, respectively, 52.1% and 20.6% among those whose disease was downstaged; 61.5% and 13.3% in those always within the criteria; and 43.3% and 41.1% in those whose disease was not downstaged.
“Our study validates national policy on downstaging prior to transplantation and shows the clear utility benefit for transplantation prioritization decision-making,” said Parissa Tabrizian, MD, co-lead author on the study and Associate Professor of Surgery at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. “These results can increase the level of recommendations for the downstaging policy on a global basis. It also demonstrates that surgical management of HCC recurrence after transplantation is associated with improved survival in well-selected patients and should be pursued. The study also supports expanding the policy of downstaging applied to guidelines in Europe and Asia.”
“Our study represents a solid confirmation that [patients with] HCC effectively downstaged to Milan criteria have an outstanding median survival of 10 years, thus providing the rationale to adopt this policy on a global basis,” said Josep Llovet, MD, PhD, co-lead author on the study and Founder and Director of the Liver Cancer Program at Mount Sinai Health System.
Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit jamanetwork.com.
