Advertisement

Standard vs Histology-Tailored Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Myxoid Liposarcoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

In an expanded cohort of a European trial reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Alessandro Gronchi, MD, and colleagues found that histology-tailored neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trabectedin was noninferior in terms of disease-free survival to standard neoadjuvant anthracycline/ifosfamide in patients with high-grade myxoid liposarcoma.

Alessandro Gronchi, MD

Alessandro Gronchi, MD

Study Details

A randomized trial performed by the Italian, Spanish, French, and Polish Sarcoma Groups compared the standard neoadjuvant regimen with a histology-tailored regimen in patients with selected localized high-risk soft-tissue sarcoma. The results of the trial showed superiority of standard treatment in disease-free survival in all soft-tissue sarcoma histologies except high-grade myxoid liposarcoma, in which the standard regimen and histology-tailored regimen (trabectedin) appeared to be equivalent.

In the current analysis, the high-grade myxoid liposarcoma cohort was expanded. The trial used a noninferiority Bayesian design, in which the histology-tailored regimen of trabectedin would be considered noninferior to the standard regimen if the posterior probability of the true hazard ratio being > 1.25 was < 5%.

Key Findings

The expanded cohort consisted of 101 patients with high-grade myxoid liposarcoma of the extremities or trunk who were randomly assigned between May 2011 and June 2020 to receive trabectedin (n = 45) or the standard anthracycline/ifosfamide regimen (n = 56). Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range = 37–89 months).

At 60 months, the probability of disease-free survival was 0.86 in the trabectedin group vs 0.73 in the standard group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24–1.46, P = .26). The posterior probability of the hazard ratio being > 1.25 for disease-free survival met the Bayesian monitoring cutoff of < 5% (4.93%); the finding indicated the noninferiority of trabectedin to anthracycline/ifosfamide.

Also at 60 months, overall survival probabilities were 0.88 in the trabectedin group vs 0.90 in the standard group (HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 0.37–3.93, P =.77).

The investigators concluded, “Trabectedin may be an alternative to standard anthracycline/ifosfamide in high-grade myxoid liposarcoma of the extremities or trunk when neoadjuvant treatment is a consideration.”

Dr. Gronchi, of the Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by a European Union grant and others. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement