Advertisement

MRI-Guided vs CT-Guided SBRT for Localized Prostate Cancer


Advertisement
Get Permission

In the single-center phase III MIRAGE trial reported in JAMA Oncology, Amar U. Kishan, MD, and colleagues found that use of margin reduction with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) resulted in significantly reduced acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity vs computed tomography (CT)-guided SBRT in patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma.

Amar U. Kishan, MD

Amar U. Kishan, MD

Study Details

In the open-label trial, 156 patients at the University of California, Los Angeles were randomly assigned between May 2020 and October 2021 to receive MRI-guided (n = 79) or CT-guided (n = 77) SBRT. Planning margins of 2 mm in the MRI group and 4 mm in the CT group were used to deliver 40 Gy in five fractions. The primary endpoint was acute (≤ 90 days from SBRT) grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity; acute grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity was a secondary endpoint.

Key Findings

A prespecified interim futility analysis conducted after 100 patients reached ≥ 90 days after SBRT was performed in October 2021, with the sample size being re-estimated and the trial closed to accrual early. All patients had ≥ 3 months of follow-up.

Grade ≥ 2 acute GU toxicity occurred in 24.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.4%–35.4%) of the MRI-guided group vs 43.4% (95% CI = 32.1%–55.3%) of the CT-guided group (P = .01). Grade ≥ 2 acute GI toxicity occurred in 0.0% (95% CI = 0.0%–4.6%) of the MRI-guided group vs 10.5% (95% CI = 4.7%–19.7%) of the CT-guided group (P = .003).

A ≥ 15-point increase in patient-reported International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 1 month was observed in 5 (6.8%) of 72 patients in the MRI-guided group vs 14 (19.4%) of 74 in the CT-guided group (P = .01). A clinically significant (≥ 12-point) decrease in patient-reported Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26 (EPIC-26) bowel score at 1 month was observed in 17 (25.0%) of 68 patients in the MRI-guided group vs 34 (50.0%) of 68 in the CT-guided group (P = .001).

The investigators concluded, “In this randomized clinical trial, compared with CT-guidance, MRI-guided SBRT significantly reduced both moderate acute physician-scored toxic effects and decrements in patient-reported quality of life. Longer-term follow-up will confirm whether these notable benefits persist.”

Dr. Kishan, of the University of California, Los Angeles, is the corresponding author for the JAMA Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Prostate Cancer Foundation, and others. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit jamanetwork.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement