Advertisement

Survival Outcomes With or Without Bilateral Risk–Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA1/BRCA2 Pathogenic Variant Carriers


Advertisement
Get Permission

In a UK study reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gandhi et al found that whereas breast cancer incidence was reduced with bilateral risk–reducing mastectomy (BRRM) among women carrying BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants, no difference vs surveillance was observed in breast cancer–specific or overall survival.

Study Details

In the study, 1,205 women attending a regional family history/genetics service who had been found to carry pathogenic variants of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (pvBRCA1/2) elected to undergo BRRM (n = 460, median age = 37.2 years) or surveillance (n = 745, median age = 38.5 years). A greater proportion of the surveillance group was older than 60 years at testing (11.4% vs 2.3%, P < .000).

Key Findings

Follow-up for cancer incidence in the whole cohort was 4,652.9 woman-years. The annual breast cancer incidence rate among all women in the study was 2.4%; in the BRRM group, it was 0.15%, representing a 94% reduction compared with surveillance (P < .001). Nine occult cancers were diagnosed at BRRM.

After 4,634 vs 5,419 woman-years of follow-up, breast cancer–specific death occurred in two patients in the BRRM group vs four in the surveillance group (P = .36). No differences in overall survival were observed for 10-year age groups, except for the 50- to 59-year group; in this age group, one death due to breast cancer was observed in the surveillance group.

The investigators concluded: “For women electing imaging surveillance over risk-reducing surgery, our results may offer reassurance that their breast cancer–specific survival and [overall survival] are unlikely to be compromised. However, breast cancer incidence rates are significantly reduced after BRRM compared with imaging surveillance, which may be important information for women with pvBRCA1/2 considering BRRM.”

Ashu Gandhi, MD, of Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

DISCLOSURE: The study was supported by grants awarded to the Manchester Biomedical Research Centre by the National Institute for Health Research. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement