Advertisement

Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence–Powered Biomarker for Selection of Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer


Advertisement
Get Permission

In a study reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Hendifar et al found that a computational histology artificial intelligence (CHAI)-powered platform could be used to identify whether gemcitabine-based (G-chemo) or fluoropyrimidine-based (F-chemo) chemotherapy is preferred as first-line treatment in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Study Details

In the multinational study, the CHAI platform extracted quantitative histomorphologic features from diagnostic biopsies. In a development cohort of 178 patients, features associated with differential outcomes measured by time to next treatment or death (TNTD) between F-chemo–treated and G-chemo–treated patients were used to develop continuous biomarker scores that were dichotomized into G-pref (favoring G-chemo) or F-pref (favoring F-chemo) results (GvF biomarker). The main outcomes of interest were TNTD and overall survival according to receipt of G-chemo or F-chemo among G-pref and F-pref patients.

Key Findings

Among 299 patients in the validation cohort, there were 126 G-pref patients and 173 F-pref patients. Among G-pref patients, 43 received G-chemo; among F-pref patients, 113 received F-chemo.

Among G-pref patients, the G-chemo group had significantly better TNTD vs the F-chemo group (median = 9.6 vs 7.2 months, P = .038), with no significant benefit in overall survival observed (median = 14.3 vs 12.4 months, P = .52).

Among F-pref patients, the F-chemo group had significantly better TNTD (median = 8.6 vs 7.5 months, P = .035) and significantly better overall survival (median = 14.4 vs 11.7 months, P = .003) vs the G-chemo group.  

In propensity score–weighted analysis, the GvF biomarker predicted the treatment effect (biomarker-treatment interaction: TNTD = P < .001, overall survival = P = .005).

The investigators concluded: “The histomorphology-based GvF biomarker predicted differential treatment benefit of first-line GvF. This biomarker can guide optimal treatment selection for first-line therapy in advanced PDAC.”

Viswesh Krishna, BS, of Valar Labs, Inc., Palo Alto, California, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

DISCLOSURE: The study was supported by the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN–Know Your Tumor), University Health Network, Toronto, and Valar Labs, Inc. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement