Young people with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received doses of tisagenlecleucel, a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, at the higher end of the approved dosing range had significantly better survival rates at 1 year compared with those who received lower doses within this range, according to research published by Stefanski et al in Blood Advances.
Since its approval as the first gene therapy available in the United States in 2017, tisagenlecleucel has offered a welcome treatment option for pediatric patients with B-cell ALL whose cancer does not respond to chemotherapy or recurs after prior response. However, the wide dosing range approved for the therapy can pose a conundrum for doctors who sometimes must choose whether to use a higher or lower dose with little evidence to guide these decisions. This new study offers the first insights into optimal dosing based on real-world data.
“In the past, we did not have data to guide clinical decisions around commercial CAR T-cell dosing and didn’t know if higher doses would affect toxicity and compromise outcomes, or support enhanced antileukemia effect,” said Liora Schultz, MD, a pediatric oncologist at the Stanford Children's Health–Lucile Packard Children's Hospital and the study’s lead author. “[These data have] direct clinical applicability, as it supports use of higher dosing, as available, within the approved tisagenlecleucel dose range.”
More About B-Cell ALL and Tisagenlecleucel
ALL is the most common type of cancer in children, and B-cell ALL is its most common subtype. It is often treatable with chemotherapy, but about 20% of patients either do not respond to chemotherapy or subsequently relapse. CAR T-cell therapy is becoming an integral part of standard care as an alternative or supplement to stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL.
Tisagenlecleucel is approved at a dosing range of 0.2 to 5 million CAR T cells/kg for patients weighing 50 kg or less, or 10 to 250 million CAR T cells for patients weighing over 50 kg. In practice, the number of CAR T cells that are manufactured for each patient varies substantially based on the number of T cells that are obtained initially and the rate at which the modified cells grow in the laboratory.
Any amount of CAR T cells within the approved range is considered an acceptable dose, but if more than the minimum number of cells are available within the approved range, doctors can decide whether to use a higher amount or a lower amount. Clinical trials for tisagenlecleucel provided guidance on dosing leading to the therapy’s approval, but real-world data are useful to fine-tune dosing and inform decision-making when there are multiple options available.
For the study, researchers analyzed rates of overall survival, event-free survival, and relapse-free survival at 1 year among 185 patients aged 26 years or younger who received tisagenlecleucel for relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL. They found that patients who received a dose at the higher end of the approved range (between 2.4 and 5.1 million cells/kg) had significantly higher survival rates according to all three measures compared with patients who received a dose at the lower end (between 0 and 1.3 million cells/kg). In the highest-dose group, 86% of patients were alive at 1 year, compared to 59% in the lowest-dose group. Researchers did not observe any signs of increased toxicity or safety concerns with higher doses.
The findings suggest that administering doses of tisagenlecleucel at the higher end of the approved range could help to achieve a more effective and long-term response—without raising the toxicity risk.
“A lot of effort is focused on complex engineering and development of next-generation CAR T-cell therapies,” said Dr. Schultz. “This study aims to explore if clinical manipulations using our current approved construct, tisagenlecleucel, can achieve even incremental advances in the field.”
The researchers plan to further examine the data to determine how additional clinical variables might influence outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy.
Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ashpublications.org/bloodadvances.The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.