Advertisement

Rescue Therapy for Newly Diagnosed High-Grade Osteosarcoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

In a Japanese trial (JCOG0905) reported in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, Hiraga et al found no disease-free survival benefit with the addition of a higher dose of ifosfamide to methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma with poor response to preoperative chemotherapy.

While the EURAMOS-1 trial previously demonstrated that the addition of ifosfamide plus etoposide to postoperative MAP did not improve prognosis for poor responders, other studies suggested that adding a higher dose of ifosfamide alone, without etoposide, to neoadjuvant chemotherapy might prove beneficial. Therefore, the JCOG0905 trial was conducted “to confirm whether the addition of a cumulative total dose of [ifosfamide] at 90 g/m2 … to poor responders would improve their prognosis, outweighing the disadvantages of additional adverse events and extended treatment duration.”

Study Details

In the multicenter open-label trial, patients aged ≤ 50 years received two cycles of preoperative MAP and underwent resection between February 2010 and August 2020. A total of 103 patients with poor response at resection were randomly assigned to continue MAP (n = 51) or receive MAP plus ifosfamide (n = 52). Ifosfamide was administered at 15 g/m2 (3 g/m2 once daily on days 1–5) for six cycles, for a cumulative total dose of 90 g/m2. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-free survival.

Key Findings

At a median follow-up of 67.1 months, disease-free survival events occurred in 20 of 52 patients in the MAP plus ifosfamide group vs 18 of 51 in the MAP group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55–1.98, P = .55), with a 3-year disease-free survival of 64.3% in both groups.  

Death occurred in 15 patients in the MAP plus ifosfamide group vs 11 patients in the MAP group (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 0.68–3.22), with 3-year overall survival of 78.8% vs 86.5%.  

Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in nine patients in the MAP plus ifosfamide group and none in the MAP group.

The investigators concluded: “Evidence from JCOG0905 does not support the addition of [ifosfamide] for patients with [poor response to preoperative chemotherapy].”

Hiroaki Hiraga, PhD, of NHO Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, is the corresponding author for the Journal of Clinical Oncology article.

Disclosure: The study was supported by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, and others. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit ascopubs.org.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement