Advertisement

Therapies Targeting DNA Damage Response Show Antitumor Activity


Advertisement
Get Permission

Results from two early-stage clinical trials show two drugs that target the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway in cancers—the ATR inhibitor elimusertib and the PARP inhibitor AZD5305—are safe and clinically beneficial in treating patients with advanced solid tumors. Principal investigator Timothy Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, Associate Professor of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, presented new data from the trials at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting 2022.

“DDR orchestrates a complex network of mechanisms that detects and repairs damage to DNA, such as double-strand breaks and replication stress,” Dr. Yap explained. “However, when DDR defects occur, it promotes uncontrolled cancer cell growth and enables cells to evade apoptosis. The studies suggest that PARP1-selective and ATR inhibitors, which block two key mediators of the DDR signaling pathway, are a promising class of new drugs that offer significant therapeutic potential for patients with cancers harboring synthetic lethal genomic alterations in DDR pathways.”


The studies suggest that PARP1-selective and ATR inhibitors, which block two key mediators of the DDR signaling pathway, are a promising class of new drugs that offer significant therapeutic potential for patients with cancers harboring synthetic lethal genomic alterations in DDR pathways.
— Timothy Yap, MBBS, PhD, FRCP

Tweet this quote

Expansion Trial of ATR Inhibitor

In a phase Ib expansion trial, elimusertib—a potent and highly selective ATR inhibitor—demonstrated antitumor activity against a range of advanced solid tumors with different putative deleterious DDR alterations (Abstract CT006).

ATR is a critical component of the DDR network that is activated by DNA damage or replication stress. By binding to ATR and blocking ATR-mediated signaling, ATR inhibitors prevent DNA damage checkpoint activation, disrupt DNA damage repair, and stop the growth of tumor cells, Dr. Yap explained.

In the study, 143 patients with advanced solid tumors with different putative deleterious DDR alterations—including 45 gynecologic cancers, 24 colorectal cancers, 19 HER2-negative breast cancers, 19 castration-resistant prostate cancers, and 36 advanced cancers with loss of alternative DDR protein ATM—received at least one dose of elimusertib. Thirty-two patients with ATM protein loss and/or mutations were enrolled in the dose-escalation arm of the study.

The most frequent drug-related grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were hematologic, including anemia (65.7%) and neutropenia (47.6%). Overall, these hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events were reversible and manageable with dose interruptions or reductions and supportive measures, and infrequently resulted in permanent drug discontinuation. An alternative schedule of 3 days on and 11 days off, which also was explored, may reduce the risk of hematologic events and offer a potential alternative to be further evaluated in future studies of elimusertib.

Elimusertib achieved clinical benefit with disease control for at least 16 weeks in approximately 35% of patients enrolled in the 3 days on, 4 days off dose-expansion arm, with durable objective responses observed across a variety of cancer types. Results showed a durable clinical benefit lasting for more than 6 months in 27.8% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, including those resistant to platinum-based therapy and those who previously had received PARP inhibitors. In patients with ATM loss, the best overall response included Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST)-defined partial responses in 8.9% of patients and RECIST-defined stable disease in 55.9% of patients, with durable clinical benefit lasting > 6 months in 26.5% of patients.

“While we observed durable responses and prolonged stable disease in patients with ATM alterations and BRCA1 and BRCA2 defects, including patients previously treated with PARP inhibitor therapy, further studies are needed to better identify molecular biomarkers to predict which patients are most likely to benefit from elimusertib monotherapy,” Dr. Yap said. “Rational combination studies are also ongoing and investigating elimusertib in combination with the PARP inhibitor niraparib and with the PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab.”

Next-Generation PARP1-Selective Inhibitor

Results from the phase I/IIa PETRA trial showed that AZD5305, a potent and highly selective next-generation PARP1 inhibitor and trapper, achieved maximal target engagement and promising clinical activity with a favorable safety profile. The targeted therapy demonstrated significantly improved pharmacokinetics and exposure above target than could be achieved with first-generation PARP inhibitors (Abstract CT007).

In addition to blocking PARP enzymatic activity, first-generation PARP inhibitors trap PARP1 and PARP2—two repair proteins that activate the DDR pathway—to the sites of DNA damage to prevent DNA repair and to selectively kill cancer cells. However, a growing body of evidence shows that only PARP1 inhibition and trapping is required for synthetic lethality in cancers with homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficiency.

“By selectively inhibiting and trapping PARP1, AZD5305 achieved greater antitumor efficacy across select tumor and molecular subtypes, more durable target inhibition, and superior tolerability compared to first-generation dual PARP1/2 inhibitors in preclinical models,” Dr. Yap said. “These exciting trial results of AZD5305 demonstrate that we can build on the success of first-generation PARP inhibitors by providing important clinical proof-of-concept for this innovative strategy. We were able to achieve substantially improved safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and promising efficacy in patients with different molecularly driven cancers with AZD5305.”

In the first-in-class, first-in-human trial, researchers enrolled and treated 61 patients with advanced breast, ovarian, prostate, or pancreatic cancers bearing germline or somatic BRCA1/2PALB2, or RAD51C/D mutations with AZD5305.

Of the 40 evaluable patients, 10 achieved RECIST-defined partial responses and 11 achieved RECIST-defined stable disease across doses, tumor types, and mutation types, and were independent of prior PARP inhibitor use.

The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse event, irrespective of causality, was anemia (14.8%), followed by neutropenia (6.6%) and thrombocytopenia (3.3%). Only two patients (3.3%) required a dose reduction after experiencing treatment-related grade 3 neutropenia and grade 1 thrombocytopenia. At the time of data cutoff, there were no dose-limiting toxicities, treatment-related serious adverse events, or treatment discontinuations. Overall, AZD5305 was well tolerated, with low rates of nausea and hematological toxicity compared to first-generation PARP inhibitors.

The drug achieved robust and durable pharmacodynamic target engagement across all dose levels, measured by the inhibition of poly ADP-ribosylation, which showed that AZD5305 led to maximal target engagement of at least 90%.

Researchers are currently conducting expansion trials to evaluate the drug’s efficacy in PARP inhibitor–naive populations and dose escalations of combination therapies, including fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki and datopotamab deruxtecan.

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit abstractsonline.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.
Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement