Fragment Analysis as a MET Exon 14 Screening Strategy in NSCLC Tumors

Comparison of two techniques used in screening non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor samples demonstrated that fragment analysis could detect large MET exon 14 skipping deletions that were missed by next-generation sequencing, according to findings presented at the Molecular Analysis for Precision Oncology (MAP) Congress 2020.¹

A team from the Molecular Oncology Department, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou–APHP in Paris conducted this study to evaluate the utility of next-generation sequencing compared with fragment analysis for the detection of MET exon 14 alterations, including skipping deletions that act as an oncogenic driver and are observed in 1% to 4% of NSCLC tumors.

Capmatinib was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for adult patients with metastatic NSCLC and MET exon 14 skipping mutations, making detection of MET alterations necessary to identify candidates for the treatment. In addition, MET exon 14 mutations may serve as a marker of low response rates to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, despite high tumor PD-L1 expression.

Comparison of Method Efficacy

The investigators examined 87 NSCLC wild-type samples for MET exon 14 by next-generation sequencing and fragment analysis that were obtained in routine settings within an 18-month period from patients with driver wild-type NSCLC.

MET exon 14 skipping was screened by fragment analysis to detect large deletions in MET exon 14 and by DNA next-generation sequencing on an Ion Proton platform using Ampliseq technology. Large deletions detected by only fragment analysis were also characterized by Sanger sequencing. PD-L1 tumor expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry.

Of the 87 patient samples evaluated by fragment analysis and sequencing, a MET exon 14 skipping alteration was detected in 13 patients. Among the 13 patients, eight samples had deletion impacting splice site and five had splice variants. Among the eight deletions, two were large deletions of 41 bp and 66 bp. These two deletions were only determined by fragment analysis and were not detected by next-generation sequencing. Histologically, there was no enrichment in samples with sarcomatoid features.

However, an association with PD-L1 expression was observed; samples with MET exon 14 skipping presented higher values of PD-L1 than other tumors screened in this study.

Conclusions

Detectionof MET alterations is warranted for the first-line treatment decision to detect exon 14 skipping and allow patient access to targeted therapy, such as capmatinib, as well as to identify patients who may have a poor response to immunotherapy, according to the authors. They concluded that these results highlight the limit of next-generation sequencing to analyze large deletions and the risk of false-negative results. The authors also noted that the link between MET exon 14 and PD-L1 expression warrants further study.

Disclosure: For full disclosures of the study authors, visit oncologypro.esmo.org.

Reference

1. Loyaux R, Blons H, Garinet S, et al: MET exon 14 screening strategy: How not to miss large deletions. MAP Virtual Congress 2020. Abstract 4MO. Presented October 9, 2020.