MUHAMMAD RAFIQUL ISLAM, MBBS, MD, MSPH, FACP
In modern health care, patient care is often defined by clinical actions such as diagnoses made, treatments delivered, and protocols followed. Clinicians are trained to prioritize technical accuracy, evidence-based interventions, and measurable outcomes. However, an equally critical and often underappreciated dimension of care lies not in what is done, but in how it is perceived by the patient. In resource-constrained settings, clinical decision-making can be particularly challenging for physicians, who must often act based on practical realities rather than ideal guidelines. This can strain trust between physician and patient, leading to gaps in communication and understanding. In one such setting, Bangladesh, for example, patients are eager to explore all available treatment options, sometimes prioritizing access over outcomes.These dynamics underscore the importance of incorporating patient perceptions and expectations as an integral part of delivering effective care. Patient care, in its truest sense, is not merely the sum of clinical tasks performed; it is the lived experience of the individual receiving those interventions.
Clinical Outcomes vs Patient Perception
There is ongoing debate regarding patient perception–based evaluations.1 Some argue that such assessments primarily reflect the patient’s subjective satisfaction, which can vary widely.2 Models like value-based care emphasize that patients should be an integral part of the health-care process, ensuring that treatment decisions and outcomes align not only with clinical guidelines but also with a patient’s values, preferences, and lived experience.3,4 Nearly one-half of patients report dissatisfaction with the Government-Financed Health Protection Scheme in Bangladesh.5 One key reason for this is that the current health outcome evaluation system does not meet adequate standards.6 Building rapport between a physician and patient when given just 48 seconds to 2 minutes together is extremely challenging.7 At the end of the encounter, physician self-assessment and system-level evaluations often rely primarily on clinical outcomes such as mortality or morbidity, largely overlooking the patient’s perceptions and experiences.8,9 Perception shapes reality in health care.10
A physician may deliver technically flawless treatment, yet if the patient feels unheard, rushed, or disrespected, the perceived quality of care diminishes. Conversely, even in resource-constrained settings, patients who feel valued, understood, and supported often report higher satisfaction and trust.11,12 This divergence highlights a fundamental truth: clinical excellence and perceived care are related but distinct constructs. At the core of patient perception is communication. Clear, empathetic, and bidirectional communication transforms clinical encounters into meaningful interactions.13 Patients interpret not only the content of what is said but also the tone, body language, and attentiveness of the clinician. A brief explanation delivered with empathy can outweigh a lengthy but impersonal consultation. In this sense, communication is not an adjunct to care—it is care.
The Physician–Patient Partnership
Trust is another central determinant. Patients assess care through their confidence in the clinician’s intent and competence.14 Trust is built through consistency, transparency, and respect for patient autonomy. When patients feel included in decision-making, their perception shifts from passive recipients of care to active partners. This partnership enhances adherence, satisfaction, and ultimately positive outcomes. Importantly, perception is also influenced by context.15 Waiting times, institutional environment, continuity of care, and even administrative processes contribute to how care is experienced. A fragmented system can undermine even the best clinical efforts, whereas a coordinated and patient-centered system amplifies them. Patient care extends beyond the clinician to the entire health-care ecosystem. The implications are significant.
Measuring health-care quality solely through clinical indicators provides an incomplete picture. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to capture the subjective dimension of care.16,17 These tools acknowledge that the patient’s voice is not peripheral but central to evaluating health-care delivery. For clinicians, this perspective requires a shift. Technical competence remains indispensable, but it must be complemented by relational competence—empathy, listening, and responsiveness. Small actions such as making eye contact, addressing concerns without interruption, listening, and explaining uncertainties honestly can significantly alter patient perception.
Summary
Ultimately, patient care is not defined by intention alone, but by interpretation. What clinicians believe they have delivered may differ from what patients believe they have received. In resource-constrained settings like Bangladesh, this gap can be even more pronounced, where limited consultation time, overburdened facilities, and systemic challenges complicate interactions. Bridging this gap is not merely about improving satisfaction scores; it is about ensuring that health care fulfills its fundamental purpose—to care for people, not just to treat disease. In such contexts, the most accurate measure of care is not found in charts, protocols, or outcomes alone, but in the patient’s experience. Patient care, therefore, is not only what we do; importantly, it is also what patients perceive.
DISCLOSURE: Dr. Islam reported no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
1. Charrier L, Ricotti A, Marnetto F, et al: Validating patient perspectives: A study on the reliability of satisfaction survey tools. Patient Prefer Adherence 19:463–72, 2025.
2. Ferreira DC, Vieira I, Pedro MI, et al: Patient satisfaction with healthcare services and the techniques used for its assessment: A systematic literature review and a bibliometric analysis. Healthcare (Basel) 11(5):639, 2023.
3. Webb A: Value-based care. Nursing 55(2):44–7, 2025.
4. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Value-based care. https://www.cms.gov/priorities/innovation/key-concepts/value-based-care. Accessed April 9, 2026.
5. Hasan MZ, Rabbani MG, Akter O, et al: Patient satisfaction with the health care services of a government-financed health protection scheme in Bangladesh: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Formative Research 8(1):e49815, 2024.
6. Spreeha Foundation: Healthcare challenges in Bangladesh: A system in crisis. https://www.spreeha.org/blog/bangladesh-healthcare-challenges. Accessed April 29, 2026.
7. The Financial Express: Doctors in Bangladesh see patients for merely 48 seconds on average, reveals study. https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/health/doctors-in-bangladesh-see-doctors-for-merely-48-seconds-on-average-reveals-study-1510301628. Accessed April 29, 2026.
8. Katsari V, Tyritidou A, Domeyer PR: Physicians’ self-assessed empathy and patients’ perceptions of physicians’ empathy: Validation of the Greek Jefferson scale of patient perception of physician empathy. Biomed Res Int 2020:9379756, 2020.
9. Young M, Smith MA: Standards and evaluation of healthcare quality, safety, and person-centered care. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK576432/ Accessed April 29, 2026.
10. Are Our Perception of Reality True? https://mdforlives.com/blog/are-our-perceptions-of-reality-true/. Accessed April 29, 2026.
11. Alghamdi SA, Ahmed AAY, Abbas SHA, et al: The impact of patient-centered care on the patient experience in healthcare settings | Intl J Med Toxicology and Legal Medicine. https://ijmtlm.org/index.php/journal/article/view/260. Accessed April 29, 2026.
12. McKee M, van Schalkwyk MC, Greenley R: Meeting the challenges of the 21st century: The fundamental importance of trust for transformation. Isr J Health Policy Res 13:21, 2024.
13. Tran BQ. Strategies for effective patient care: Integrating quality communication with the patient-centered approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15(1):e12574, 2021.
14. Adekunle TA, Knowles JM, Hantzmon SV, et al: A qualitative analysis of trust and distrust within patient-clinician interactions. PEC Innov 3:100187, 2023.
15. Dorri N. The role of health perception in preventive care. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 12:100689, 2025.
16. What are patient reported experience measures? https://www.talkinghealthtech.com/glossary/patient-reported-experience-measures-prems Accessed April 29, 2026.
17. What are patient-reported measures? https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/patient-experience/prems-proms/index.html. Accessed April 29, 2026.
Dr. Islam is Assistant Professor and Clinical Researcher in Medical Oncology at the National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh, as well as a postdoctoral scholar at the Institute for Population and Precision Health at The University of Chicago.
