FOUR RANDOMIZED trials have shown improvements in recurrence-free survival in patients with high-risk melanoma with the administration of adjuvant therapy over the past 3 years, noted formal discussant of the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial, Antoni Ribas, MD, Director of the Tumor Immunology Program at Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f03f/8f03f668e0d0e92285f7e8db09ce7504e03cac1f" alt="Antoni Ribas, MD"
Antoni Ribas, MD
At the 2018 American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting, Dr. Ribas told listeners: “Before KEYNOTE-054 results were known, nivolumab (Opdivo) was better than ipilimumab (Yervoy) or placebo, … and dabrafenib (Tafinlar) plus trametinib (Mekinist) was better than placebo. Now we have a series of new questions: Does adjuvant therapy improve overall survival? Is one anti– programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy better than another? In patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, should we start treatment with a BRAF inhibitor plus a MEK inhibitor or anti–PD-1?”
Survival is not available for two of the four trials, so the first question is not answerable for the two anti–PD-1 antibodies yet. For the second question, Dr. Ribas pointed out it is difficult to compare studies, but if you look at the two trials of anti–PD-1 agents, the experimental arms overlap.
Best Strategy?
WHICH ANTI–PD-1 drug is better? It turns out they are comparable. “Nivolumab and pembrolizumab [Keybruda] are like Coke and Pepsi,” he stated.
It is still not clear which is the best strategy for BRAF-mutated melanoma. Longer follow-up is needed of the KEYNOTE-054 trial, as it was reported in its first interim analysis, with most patients only followed for 12 months. In KEYNOTE-054, anti–PD-1 adjuvant therapy appears to provide benefit in both BRAF-mutated and BRAF wild-type melanomas. Toxicity profiles suggest that grade 3 to 4 treatment-related toxicities occur in about 15% of patients treated with an anti–PD-1 agent and 31% in those who receive dabrafenib and trametinib. However, most of the toxicities with the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib improve when stopping the therapy, whereas toxicities with anti–PD-1 antibodies, in particular endocrine toxicities, can be long-lasting.
“Persistent endocrine toxicities such as hypothyroidism, hypopituitarism, or type 1 diabetes, can occur with nivolumab and pembrolizumab, and long-term supplemental hormonal therapy could be needed,” Dr. Ribas said.
“Pending the survival results of a phase III adjuvant clinical trial comparing high-dose interferon vs pembrolizumab, high-dose interferon may no longer be needed. Longer follow-up is needed to assess overall survival and subgroup results. For patients with high-risk disease, decide which therapy to select based on discussions with those patients,” Dr. Ribas concluded. ■
DISCLOSURE: Dr. Ribas has served on scientific advisory boards for and/or received honoraria from Amgen, Chugai, Genentech, Merck, and Novartis.