Advertisement

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab Improves Distant Metastasis–Free Survival in Resected High-Risk Stage III Melanoma


Advertisement
Get Permission

As reported in The Lancet Oncology by Alexander M.M. Eggermont, MD, of Princess Máxima Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands, and colleagues, the pivotal phase III EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 trial has shown significant improvement in the secondary endpoint of distant metastasis–free survival, as well as continued benefit in the primary endpoint of recurrence-free survival, with adjuvant pembrolizumab vs placebo in patients with resected high-risk stage III melanoma.1

Alexander M.M. Eggermont, MD

Alexander M.M. Eggermont, MD

Pembrolizumab was approved in this setting in February 2019 on the basis of improved recurrence-free survival at final analysis after a median 15-month follow-up (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.57, 98.4% confidence interval [CI] = 0.43–0.74, P < .0001).

Study Details

In the double-blind trial, 1,019 patients from sites in 23 countries were randomly assigned between August 2015 and November 2016 to receive pembrolizumab at 200 mg (n = 514) or placebo (n = 505) every 3 weeks for up to 18 doses or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. Patients had American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system, 7th edition (AJCC-7) stage IIIA (at least one lymph node metastasis > 1 mm), IIIB, or IIIC (without in-transit metastasis) disease.

The co-primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population and in patients with PD-L1–positive tumors.The secondary endpoint reported herein was distant metastasis–free survival in the ITT and PD-L1–positive populations. PD-L1 positive status was defined as tumor or tumor-associated immune cell expression > 1%.

Distant Metastasis–Free Survival

Among 71 patients in the pembrolizumab group and 94 in the placebo group with a first locoregional recurrence, 43.7% vs 74.2% received subsequent systemic therapy, the most common being a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor (22.5% vs 69.9%) and a BRAF-MEK inhibitor (18.3% vs 8.6%).

Median follow-up was 42.3 months (interquartile range = 40.5–45.9 months). Distant metastasis–free survival at 3.5 years was 65.3% (95% CI = 60.9%–69.5%) in the pembrolizumab group vs 49.4% (95% CI = 44.8–53.8%) in the placebo group in the ITT population (HR stratified by stage = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.49–0.73, P < .0001) and 66.7% (95% CI = 61.8%–71.2%) vs 51.6% (95% CI = 46.6%–56.4%) among 853 patients (428 vs 425) with PD-L1–positive tumors (stratified HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49–0.76, P < .0001). In the ITT population, rates were 82.8% vs 69.8% at 1 year, 73.5% vs 56.0% at 2 years, and 68.2% vs 51.5% at 3 years.

Among 116 patients (59 vs 57) with PD-L1–negative tumors, 3.5-year distant metastasis–free survival was 58.0% (95% CI = 44.1%–69.5%) in the pembrolizumab group vs 40.2% (95% CI = 27.0%–53.0%) in the placebo group (HR = 0.57, 99% CI = 0.29–1.15). Among 50 patients (27 vs 23) with PD-L1 indeterminate status, rates were 59.3% (95% CI = 38.6%–75.0%) vs 28.6% (95% CI = 11.7%–48.2%; HR = 0.49, 99% CI = 0.17–1.35). Hazard ratios according to AJCC-7 disease stage were 0.64 (99% CI = 0.27–1.53) among 77 vs 75 patients with stage IIIA, 0.58 (99% CI = 0.40–0.86) among 239 vs 232 with stage IIIB, and 0.61 (99% CI = 0.42–0.88) among 198 vs 198 with stage IIIC disease.

In analysis with patients staged according to AJCC 8th edition classification, hazard ratios were 0.63 (95% CI = 0.19–2.04) among 42 vs 40 patients with stage IIIA, 0.60 (95% CI = 0.37–0.97) among 163 vs 190 with stage IIIB, 0.56 (95% CI = 0.40–0.78) among 267 vs 238 with stage IIIC, and 0.41 (95% CI = 0.13–1.30) among 20 vs 19 with stage IIID disease.

Distant metastasis–free survival at 3 years was 67.0% vs 44.4% (HR = 0.53, 99% CI = 0.36–0.77) among 209 vs 231 patients with BRAF V600E– or BRAF V600K–mutant tumors and 65.0% vs 54.1% among 234 vs 215 patients with BRAF wild-type tumors (HR = 0.73, 99% CI = 0.50–1.07).

Updated Recurrence-Free Survival Outcomes

Among 379 patients in the pembrolizumab group vs 289 in the placebo group who were alive and without recurrence at the time of final recurrence-free survival analysis, recurrence-free survival events occurred in 18% vs 25% of patients during the additional follow-up reflected in the current updated analysis.

Recurrence-free survival at 3.5 years was 59.8% (95% CI = 55.3%–64.1%) in the pembrolizumab group vs 41.4% (95% CI = 37.0%–45.8%) in the placebo group in the ITT population (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.49–0.70); rates were 75.3% vs 60.0% at 1 year, 68.0% vs 46.9% at 2 years, and 63.7% vs 43.5% at 3 years. In the PD-L1–positive population, recurrence-free survival at 3.5 years was 61.4% (95% CI = 56.3%–66.1%) in the pembrolizumab group vs 44.1% (95% CI = 39.2%–48.8%) in the placebo group (HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.49–0.73). In the PD-L1–negative population, recurrence-free survival at 3.5 years was 55.2% (95% CI = 41.6%–66.9%) in the pembrolizumab group vs 30.1% (95% CI = 18.2%–43.0%) in the placebo group (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23–0.90).

Distant metastasis was the first disease recurrence event in 25% vs 38% of patients, either alone (23% vs 33%) or together with locoregional recurrence (2% vs 6%). The 3.5-year cumulative incidence of distant metastasis as the first site of recurrence was 24.9% vs 39.5% (HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.46–0.72). Locoregional recurrence alone as a first event occurred in 14% vs 18% (HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.54–1.00); locoregional recurrence alone or combined with distant metastasis occurred in 15% vs 24%.

KEY POINTS

  • Pembrolizumab significantly prolonged distant metastasis–free survival among all patients and in the PD-L1–positive population.
  • Pembrolizumab continued to be associated with significantly improved recurrence-free survival at a median of 3.5 years.

The investigators concluded: “Pembrolizumab adjuvant therapy provided a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in distant metastasis–free survival at a 3.5-year median follow-up, which was consistent with the improvement in recurrence-free survival. Therefore, the results of this trial support the indication to use adjuvant pembrolizumab therapy in patients with resected high-risk stage III cutaneous melanoma.” 

DISCLOSURE: The study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme. Dr. Eggermont holds stock or other ownership interests in RiverD and Skyline Diagnostics; has received honoraria from BIOCAD, BIOINVENT, BioNTech AG, CatalYm, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, IO Biotech, ISA Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Sellas Life Sciences, and Skyline Diagnostics; has served as a consultant or advisor to BIOINVENT, CatalYm, Ellipses Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, IO BIOTECH, ISA Pharmaceuticals, MSD, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Sellas Life Sciences, and Skyline Diagnostics; and has participated in a speakers bureau for BIOCAD, BMSi, and MSD.

REFERENCE

1. Eggermont AMM, Blank CU, Mandalà M, et al: Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma (EORTC 1325-MG/KEYNOTE-054): Distant metastasis-free survival results from a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 22:643-654, 2021.


Related Articles

Benefits of Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Melanoma Reinforced by EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054 Updates

Adjuvant anti–PD-1 antibody therapy is widely used for stage III melanoma, given the approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab. These approvals were based on significantly improved relapse-free survival in the CheckMate 238 trial of nivolumab compared with ipilimumab and the EORTC 1325/KEYNOTE-054...

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement