Advertisement

Gene Expression–Based Biomarker Predicts Long-Term Risk of Breast Cancer Recurrence

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Although the breast cancer index (BCI), 21-gene recurrence score, and ICH4 gene signature were all able to predict recurrence risk in the first 5 years, only the BCI was able to accurately assess long-term recurrence risk.
  • The BCI was able to clearly distinguish 60% of patients whose risk was quite low from 40% who continued to be at significant long-term risk.
  • The BCI may provide a much-needed tool in identifying patients who need extended hormonal therapy and those who may be spared its adverse side effects.

A comparison of three methods of predicting the risk of recurrence in women treated for estrogen-receptor–positive breast cancer found that only the breast cancer index (BCI)—a biomarker based on the expression levels of seven tumor-specific genes—accurately identified patients who continue to be at risk after 5 years of treatment with either tamoxifen or the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole. The study, which compared the BCI with the 21-gene recurrence score and an immunohistochemical prognostic model, was published online in The Lancet Oncology.

"We have validated a unique 'fingerprint' in the primary tumor of breast cancer patients that can help identify a high or low risk of cancer recurrence," said study coauthor Paul Goss, MD, PhD, Director of the Breast Cancer Research Program at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer Center. "This should enable us to offer prolonged treatment to patients who remain at risk and, importantly, to avoid the costs and side effects of treatment in those at low risk."

Breast Cancer Index

Standard treatment for early-stage, estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer includes 5 years of treatment with either tamoxifen or an aromatase inhibitor. While that approach is sufficient for most patients, some continue to experience recurrence during subsequent years. The study authors noted that knowing whether or not a patient continues to be at risk is essential to determining whether prolonged treatment is necessary.

Researchers at Massachusetts General Hospital previously developed, in collaboration with investigators from bioTheranostics, Inc, two biomarkers for recurrence risk assessment—the molecular grade index, which measures expression levels of five genes related to tumor proliferation, and the H/I ratio, which compares expression levels of two other genes. BCI is a combination of both biomarkers and has been shown to identify patients who are at risk of early recurrence despite receiving hormonal treatment.

Study Details

The current study, led by Dennis Sgroi, MD, of the MGH Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, was designed to compare the ability of the BCI to predict long-term recurrence risk with that of two other gene-expression signatures that can predict risk in the first 5 years—the 21-gene recurrence score (Oncotype DX), the current gold standard for guiding clinical decision-making, and the less frequently used ICH4 gene signature. All three methods were used to analyze primary tumor samples from more than 650 participants in a clinical trial comparing tamoxifen with anastrozole. Assay results were compared with patient records to determine individual rates of recurrence up to 10 years after initial surgical treatment.  

While all three methods were able to predict recurrence risk in the first 5 years, only the BCI was able to accurately assess long-term recurrence risk. In fact, the BCI was able to clearly distinguish 60% of patients whose risk was quite low from 40% who continued to be at significant long-term risk.

May Help Identify Candidates for Extended Therapy

"We know that more than half the instances of recurrence in [estrogen receptor]–positive breast cancer occur after 5 years of therapy with tamoxifen or anastrozole, so these findings are highly relevant to clinical management," said Dr. Sgroi. "Since the BCI identifies two distinct risk groups, it may provide a much-needed tool in determining those patients who need extended hormonal therapy and those who may be spared its well-known adverse side effects."

Support for the study includes grants from the Avon Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, the Breast Cancer Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Defense Breast Cancer Research Program.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement