Advertisement

Study Evaluates Therapeutic Impact of Laparoscopic Para-aortic Staging Surgery before Chemoradiotherapy in Cervical Cancer

Advertisement

Key Points

  • In patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and PET-CT­–negative imaging of the para-aortic area who underwent laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy, 12% had para-aortic nodal involvement.
  • 3-year event-free survival was similar in those with no involved nodes and those with nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm.
  • Survival of patients with para-aortic nodal involvement > 5 mm remained poor, despite the absence of extrapelvic disease on PET-CT imaging.

In a study reported in Journal of Clinical Oncology, Sebastien Gouy, MD, of Institut Gustave Roussy, and colleagues evaluated survival outcomes in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative PET-CT imaging results who underwent laparoscopic para-aortic staging surgery before chemoradiotherapy. They found that event-free survival was similar in patients with no nodal involvement and in those with nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm and much lower in those with nodal involvement > 5 mm.   

Study Details

The prospective study was performed in three French comprehensive cancer centers. Overall, it included 237 patients treated from 2004 to 2011 for locally advanced cervical cancer who had PET-CT–negative imaging of the para-aortic area and underwent laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Radiation fields were extended to the para-aortic area when para-aortic nodes were found to be involved. Chemoradiotherapy modalities were homogeneous across the three institutions. Patients with a poor prognosis histologic subtype or peritoneal carcinosis were excluded from the study.

Clinical International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were IB2 in 79 patients (33%), IIA in 10 (5%), IIB in 121 (50%), III in 22 (10%), and IVA in 5 (2%). Histologic subtype was squamous carcinoma in 129 (84%), and the remainder had adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous lesions. The vast majority of patients had conformational radiation therapy (95%), cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy (99.6%), and uterovaginal brachytherapy (97%).

In total, 29 patients (12.2%) had nodal involvement—ie, false-negative PET-CT results—including 16 (6.8%) with a para-aortic nodal metastasis measuring > 5 mm and 13 (5.5%) with a nodal metastasis measuring ≤ 5 mm. Among patients with para-aortic metastasis ≤ 5 mm, 10 had a single metastatic node and 3 had two positive nodes. Among patients with metastasis > 5 mm, 3 patients had a single metastatic node.

Survival Outcomes

In the entire population, overall survival was 88% at 3 years, 86% at 4 years, and 78% at 5 years, and event-free survival was 71%, 66%, and 62%, respectively. Event-free survival rates at 3 years in patients without para-aortic nodal involvement, with metastasis measuring ≤ 5 mm, and with metastasis measuring > 5 mm were 74%, 69%, and 17%, respectively (P < .001), and respective 3-year overall survival rates were 89%, 100%, and 40% (P = .04). Analysis by number of involved nodes showed 3-year event-free survival rates of  74%, 81%, and 16% for those with no involved nodes, one involved node, and two or more involved nodes, respectively (P < .001).

The investigators concluded, “To our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients reported undergoing such a strategy. We obtained the same survival rate for patients with para-aortic nodal metastasis ≤ 5 mm and patients without para-aortic lymph node involvement, suggesting that this strategy is highly efficient in such patients. Conversely, the survival of patients with para-aortic nodal involvement > 5 mm remained poor, despite the absence of extrapelvic disease on PET-CT imaging in this subgroup.”

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement