Advertisement

ECHELON-2: Brentuximab Vedotin Plus Chemotherapy in CD30-Positive Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Brentuximab vedotin plus CHP was associated with improved progression-free and overall survival vs CHOP.
  • Median progression-free survival was 48.2 vs 20.8 months.

As reported by Horwitz et al in The Lancet, the phase III ECHELON-2 trial showed that brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris) plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (CHP) improved progression-free and overall survival vs cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas. The trial supported the recent approval of brentuximab vedotin plus chemotherapy in this setting.

Data from ECHELON-2 were also presented at the 2018 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition. 

Study Details

In the double-blind trial, 452 patients from 132 sites in 17 countries with previously untreated CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas, targeting 75% with systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma, were randomly assigned between January 2013 and November 2016 to receive brentuximab vedotin plus CHP (n = 226) or CHOP (n = 226) for six or eight 21-day cycles. All patients received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m² and doxorubicin 50 mg/m² on day 1 of each cycle and oral prednisone 100 mg once daily on days 1 to 5 of each cycle, followed by either brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg and placebo or vincristine 1.4 mg/m² and placebo on day 1 of each cycle.

The primary endpoint was progression-free survival on blinded independent central review in the intent-to-treat population. Overall, 72% of the brentuximab vedotin group and 68% of the CHOP group had systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

Progression-Free and Overall Survival

After median follow-up of 36.2 months, median progression-free survival was 48.2 months in the brentuximab vedotin group vs 20.8 months in the CHOP group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, P = .0110). Three-year progression-free survival was 57.1% vs 44.4%. Hazard ratios were 0.29 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.11–0.79) among 98 patients with ALK-positive and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.44–0.95) among 218 patients with ALK-negative systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma.

As of data cutoff, death had occurred in 23% of the brentuximab vedotin group vs 32% of the CHOP group (HR = 0.66, P = .0244). After median follow-up of 42.1 months, median overall survival was not reached in either group; 75th percentile overall survival was not reached in the brentuximab vedotin group vs 17.5 months in the CHOP group.

Adverse Events

Adverse events of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 66% of the brentuximab vedotin group vs 65% of the CHOP group. Diarrhea of any grade was more common in the brentuximab vedotin group (38% vs 20%). Serious adverse events occurred in 39% vs 38%. Adverse events led to discontinuation of treatment in 6% vs 7%. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18% vs 15% and any grade peripheral neuropathy in 52% vs 55%. Adverse events led to death in 3% vs 4% of patients.

The investigators concluded, “Front-line treatment with [brentuximab vedotin plus] CHP is superior to CHOP for patients with CD30-positive peripheral T-cell lymphomas as shown by a significant improvement in progression-free survival and overall survival with a manageable safety profile.”

Steven Horwitz, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, is the corresponding author for The Lancet article.

Disclosure: The study was funded by Seattle Genetics, Inc; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited; and the National Cancer Institute. The study authors’ full disclosures can be found at thelancet.com.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement