Advertisement

Understanding and Managing Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Cathepsin B is known to be a biomarker in several types of cancer.
  • Researchers studied which biological pathway enabled CPR-4 to signal changes in healthy cells that were never exposed to radiation. They identified a pathway mediated by the insulin-like growth factor receptor DAF-2.
  • A tumor suppressor gene called P53 may be at play in radiation-induced bystander effect, prompting cells to produce more of the damaging CPR-4 protein when a cell is exposed to radiation.

More than half of patients with cancer undergo radiotherapy. Due to a phenomenon known as radiation-induced bystander effect, in which irradiated cells leak chemical signals that can travel some distance to damage unexposed healthy cells, many suffer side effects such as hair loss, fatigue, and skin problems. This bystander effect may also make targeted cells resistant to radiation treatment, research suggests.

A new University of Colorado (CU) Boulder study, published by Peng et al in Nature, sheds new light on the precise mechanism behind radiation-induced bystander effect, identifying both a protein released by irradiated cells and the pathway it takes to influence healthy ones. Ultimately, researchers hope it could lead to medication patients could take before radiation treatment to mitigate radiation-induced bystander effect.

“Inhibiting radiation-induced bystander effect would allow doctors to kill two birds with one stone,” said lead author Ding Xue, PhD, Professor of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology at CU Boulder who collaborated with colleagues in China, Taiwan, and Japan for the study. “We could minimize the bad effects of radiotherapy on healthy bystander cells, and at the same time, enhance cancer cell killing by radiotherapy.”

Caenorhabditis elegans

The 9-year study used a translucent, 1,000-cell worm called Caenorhabditis elegans as a model to study the bystander effect in action.

First, to be sure radiation-induced bystander effect occurred in C elegans, researchers exposed a population of the worms to radiation, then took a medium secreted by the C elegans cells and bathed healthy C elegans in it. The once-healthy animals began to show increased embryo deaths and other signs of radiation-induced bystander effect.

The researchers then systematically treated the medium with agents designed to destroy proteins, DNA, and RNA, in order to determine which may be a key compound at play in radiation-induced bystander effect. When the medium was treated with a protease, which breaks down proteins, C elegans exposed to it did not show signs of radiation-induced bystander effect.

Protein Behind Radiation-Induced Bystander Effect

Once researchers discovered that the agent causing radiation-induced bystander effect was a protein, they used a technique called mass spectrometry to establish which proteins present in the medium were at play. A protein called CPR-4—the C elegans version of a human protease called cathepsin B—emerged as the prime candidate. Cathepsin B is known to be a biomarker in several types of cancer.

Researchers then studied which biological pathway enabled CPR-4 to signal changes in healthy cells that were never exposed to radiation. They identified a pathway mediated by the insulin-like growth factor receptor DAF-2.

To confirm these findings, they irradiated the heads of C elegans who either lacked the gene that codes for CPR-4 or lacked the gene that codes for insulin-like growth factor receptor DAF-2. The bystander effect was blunted, with cells elsewhere in the body remaining healthy.

The study also found that a tumor suppressor gene called P53 may be at play in radiation-induced bystander effect, prompting cells to produce more of the damaging CPR-4 protein when a cell is exposed to radiation.

“This is basically the first comprehensive study to identify the factor and mechanisms behind this radiation-induced bystander effect in animals,” said Dr. Xue, who hopes to work with other researchers in the future to identify other RIBE factors and mechanisms and help develop drugs that inhibit them. “We are excited about these findings and believe they could have broad implications for patients as well as other important areas such as radiation protection and radiation safety,” he concluded.

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement