Improved Outcomes With Aromatase Inhibitors vs Tamoxifen in Early Breast Cancer
In a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials reported in The Lancet by the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), 5 years of aromatase inhibitor treatment significantly reduced the recurrence risk vs 5 years of tamoxifen therapy during the first 4 years and reduced the 10-year breast cancer mortality vs tamoxifen. In trials in which a comparator group received tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, recurrence rates were lower with aromatase inhibitors during the period that treatment differed between groups.
Study Details
The meta-analyses included individual data on 31,920 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor–positive early breast cancer in randomized trials of 5 years of an aromatase inhibitor vs 5 years of tamoxifen; 5 years of an aromatase inhibitor vs 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen then an aromatase inhibitor to year 5; and 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen then an aromatase inhibitor to year 5 vs 5 years of tamoxifen. Outcomes were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis stratified by age, nodal status, and trial, yielding aromatase inhibitor vs tamoxifen first-event rate ratios (RRs; P values are two-sided).
Comparison Outcomes
In the comparison of 5 years of an aromatase inhibitor vs 5 years of tamoxifen, recurrence was significantly reduced with aromatase inhibitors during years 0 to 1 (RR = 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52–0.78) and 2 to 4 (RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.68–0.93) and nonsignificantly thereafter. Ten-year breast cancer mortality was 12.1% vs 14.2% (RR = 0.85, P = .009).
In the comparison of 5 years of an aromatase inhibitor vs 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor to year 5, recurrence was significantly reduced with aromatase inhibitors during years 0 to 1 (RR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62–0.89) but not while both groups received aromatase inhibitors during years 2 to 4 or thereafter. In these trials, risk of recurrence was lower with 5 years of aromatase inhibitors vs tamoxifen followed by aromatase inhibitors (RR = 0.90, P = .045), but the reduction in 10-year breast cancer mortality was not significant (RR = 0.89, P = .11).
In the comparison of 2 to 3 years of tamoxifen then an aromatase inhibitor to year 5 vs 5 years of tamoxifen, the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced with aromatase inhibitors during years 2 to 4 (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.46–0.67) but not thereafter. Ten-year breast cancer mortality was lower with switching to aromatase inhibitors vs remaining on tamoxifen (8.7% vs 10.1%, P = .015).
When all three types of comparison were pooled, recurrence was significantly reduced with aromatase inhibitors during periods when treatments differed (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.64–0.77) but not significantly thereafter (RR = 0.93, P = .08). Breast cancer mortality was reduced with aromatase inhibitors when treatments differed (RR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.67–0.92), subsequently (RR = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.81–0.99), and for all periods combined (RR = 0.86, P = .0005). All-cause mortality was also reduced (RR = 0.88, P = .0003).
Aromatase inhibitor treatment was associated with a reduced risk for endometrial cancers (10-year incidence = 0.4% vs 1.2%, RR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.21–0.51) and an increased risk of bone fractures (5-year risk = 8.2% vs 5.5%, RR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.28–1.57).
The investigators concluded: “Aromatase inhibitors reduce recurrence rates by about 30% (proportionately) compared with tamoxifen while treatments differ but not thereafter. Five years of an aromatase inhibitor reduces 10-year breast cancer mortality rates by about 15% compared with 5 years of tamoxifen, hence by about 40% (proportionately) compared with no endocrine treatment.”
The study was funded by Cancer Research UK, Medical Research Council. For full disclosures of the study authors, visit www.thelancet.com.
The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.