Advertisement

Bevacizumab Approved as Combination Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer after Progression on First-line Bevacizumab Therapy

Advertisement

Key Points

  • The FDA has approved bevacizumab (Avastin) for use in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin based chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose disease has progressed on a first-line bevacizumab-containing regimen.
  • The recommended bevacizumab dose and schedule in this setting is 5 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks or 7.5 mg/kg administered every 3 weeks as a 60-minute IV infusion.

On January 23, 2013, the FDA approved bevacizumab (Avastin) for use in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin based chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer whose disease has progressed on a first-line bevacizumab-containing regimen. Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to human vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), preventing the interaction of VEGF to its receptors on the surface of endothelial cells.

Study Details

This approval is based on the results of a randomized, open-label, multinational trial enrolling patients with metastatic colorectal cancer that progressed during or within 3 months of discontinuation of bevacizumab-based combination chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin or fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan in the first line.

The clinical trial accrued 820 patients who were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive crossover chemotherapy alone (n = 411) or crossover chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (n = 409). Patients received either irinotecan-based therapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy depending on prior treatment (ie, irinotecan-based regimen for patients who received prior treatment with oxaliplatin and oxaliplatin-based therapy for patients who received prior treatment with irinotecan). The treatment cycles on both arms were repeated every 2 or 3 weeks, depending on the chemotherapy regimen used, and bevacizumab was administered at a dose of 5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 2 weeks or 7.5 mg/kg by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks.  Bevacizumab was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

The primary efficacy endpoint was overall survival. Treatment assignment was stratified by first-line treatment (irinotecan-based vs oxaliplatin-based), first-line progression-free survival (more than 9 months vs 9 months or less), time from last bevacizumab dose (more than 42 days vs 42 days or less), and ECOG performance status (0-1 vs 2).

Results

The median age of the study population was 63 years, 64% were men, and 96% had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. A statistically significant improvement in overall survival was observed in patients receiving crossover chemotherapy plus bevacizumab compared to those receiving crossover chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69–0.94; P = .0062, unstratified log-rank test). Median overall survival was 11.2 and 9.8 months for patients on the crossover chemotherapy plus bevacizumab and crossover chemotherapy arms, respectively. Progression-free survival was also significantly improved in patients receiving crossover chemotherapy plus bevacizumab compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone (HR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.59–0.78; P < .0001). The median progression-free survival times were 5.7 and 4.0 months, respectively.

No new safety signals were observed in this trial. The safety data was consistent with the known safety profile established in previously approved indications.

The recommended dose and schedule in patients receiving bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-irinotecan or fluoropyrimidine-oxaliplatin based chemotherapy after progression on a first-line bevacizumab containing regimen is 5 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks or 7.5 mg/kg administered every 3 weeks as a 60-minute IV infusion.

Full prescribing information is available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/125085s263lbl.pdf

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement