Advertisement


Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, on Surviving Childhood Leukemia Near the Border of the United States and Mexico

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Advertisement

Paula Aristizabal, MD, MAS, of the University of California, San Diego, and Rady Children’s Hospital, talks about using a health systems strengthening approach to improve leukemia care and survival in a public Mexican hospital in the region of the border between the United States and Mexico. The demonstrated increase in overall survival across a decade after implementation of the program seems to validate the use of such models, not only to improve clinical outcomes, but also to build sustainable hospital capacity, financially and organizationally (Abstract 1502).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
Paula Aristizabal, MD: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is the most common childhood cancer and survival has improved dramatically in high income countries to rates over 80%. Unfortunately, in low and middle income countries, survival has not increased at the same pace. For example, in Mexico, a low income country that is just across the border from the US, survival range is between 10% and 60%. Since in San Diego we share a border with Tijuana, we saw the disparities and we thought that it was our social responsibility to do something about it so we implemented a twinning program and twinning involves when a center of excellence in a high income country partners and collaborates with a center in a low, middle income country. We started this twinning program in 2008 in collaboration with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and we were able to implement a new team in Tijuana that was able to provide the best care possible for all the pediatric cancers. Then in 2013, we realized that the burden of leukemia was getting higher and higher and we decided to implement a new model of health system strengthening called the WHO Framework for Action. The WHO Framework for Action has six building blocks that provide all the elements to improve care in a health system. We incorporated the WHO Framework for Action into the already existing twinning model to improve leukemia survival. We provided training to the team in Tijuana. We provided protocols that they could adapt. We provided mentorship and we provided support for a new infrastructure to develop the best possible leukemia care for children with with leukemia in Baja, California, Mexico. After the implementation of the program, survival for leukemia improved from 59% to 65% and, importantly, the survival for standard risk leukemia improved from 73% before implementing the program to 100%, which is totally amazing because that is the same survival that we have in San Diego, just 20 miles from Tijuana. Survival for high risk leukemia improved from 48% to 55%. It wasn't so significant but we know that that is an area of improvement that we hope that we can tackle in our next steps of the program. Our model in Tijuana, combining a twinning program with the WHO Framework for Action, was effective in improving survival in a low and middle income country. This model can be applicable to a partnership between a high income country and a low, middle income country, especially in regions that share a border but also in other low and middle income countries remotely. Something that we learned from COVID is that you can apply many of these models working remotely and we are extremely pleased with these results. Our next steps include the improvement of the survival for patients with high risk leukemia.

Related Videos

Lymphoma

Reid Merryman, MD, on High-Risk Follicular Lymphoma: New Data on Epcoritamab, Rituximab, and Lenalidomide

Reid Merryman, MD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, discusses his findings on the regimen of epcoritamab plus rituximab and lenalidomide for patients with high-risk follicular lymphoma. Regardless of whether their disease progressed within 24 months of first-line chemoimmunotherapy, this regimen showed antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with relapsed or refractory disease. Epcoritamab, a subcutaneous T-cell–engaging bispecific antibody, may abrogate the negative effects of high-risk features (Abstract 7506).

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, on ASCO 2023 Perspectives: The Power of Connecting and Collaborating

Clifford A. Hudis, MD, ASCO Chief Executive Officer, talks about extending the reach and impact of ASCO by partnering with patients who play a key role in advancing science through clinical trial participation. With near-record numbers of registered attendees, the 2023 Annual Meeting fostered new connections and plans for collaborations.

Issues in Oncology

Carmen E. Guerra, MD, MSCE, on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Clinical Trials: Expert Commentary

Carmen E. Guerra, MD, MSCE, of the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, discusses three key abstracts presented at ASCO: strategies to increase accrual of underrepresented populations in Alliance NCTN trials, how patient-clinician education can strengthen partnerships and improve diversity in breast and lung cancer trials, and mediators of racial and ethnic inequities in clinical trial participation among U.S. patients with cancer from 2011 to 2022 (Abstracts 6509, 6510, 6511).

Bladder Cancer

Christian Pfister, MD, PhD, on Bladder Cancer: New Overall Survival Data on Perioperative Chemotherapy

Christian Pfister, MD, PhD, of Rouen University Hospital, discusses phase III results from the VESPER trial, which showed that dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin provided a better overall survival rate at 5 years and improved disease-specific survival compared with gemcitabine as perioperative chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Abstract LBA4507). 

Lymphoma

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, on B-Cell Malignancies and Long-Term Safety of Pirtobrutinib

Catherine C. Coombs, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, discusses prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy, which continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in patients on therapy for 12 months or more were similar to previously published safety analyses of all patients enrolled, regardless of follow-up (Abstract 7513).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement