Advertisement


Julie R. Brahmer, MD, FASCO, on Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous NSCLC: HARMONi-6 Trial

ASCO 2026

Advertisement

Julie R. Brahmer, MD, FASCO, of the Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, provides expert commentary on the overall survival results from the phase III HARMONi-6 trial presented in this year’s Plenary Session. The study compared ivonescimab plus chemotherapy vs tislelizumab plus chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with advanced squamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (Abstract LBA4).



Transcript

Disclaimer: This video transcript has not been proofread or edited and may contain errors.
This trial was a first-line advanced non–small cell lung cancer trial that randomized patients with squamous non–small cell lung cancer to either ivonescimab plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin or tislelizumab, which is a PD-1 antibody, and chemotherapy. And then the primary overall survival, which was previously presented, was progression-free survival. And today, we heard the interim overall survival analysis that was made possible because the prior progression-free survival was positive. Now, this study is a study of ivonescimab, which is a VEGF/PD-1 bispecific antibody. So it has both a VEGF antibody toward VEGF combined with a PD-1 antibody. And this combination is felt to have an advantage because it pulls the antibody into the tumor microenvironment and it increases the affinity of that antibody to PD-1. And the hope is that it increases antitumor immunity but potentially cuts down on VEGF systemic toxicity. But that's unclear right now. But today, Dr. Liu and colleagues presented the overall survival advantage. Now, this study didn't make an interim cut, so this is an early look, but it was preplanned. And because it showed an improved survival in these patients, it's important for us to know these data. And so the hazard ratio was 0.66. So that is nearly a 40% reduction in death for those patients who received ivonescimab plus chemotherapy. And then also the median overall survival was approximately 28 months in the experimental arm, but in the control arm, it was about 24 months. Now, the median follow-up was about 21 months. And with that, it does give us a little bit of pause because there was a lot of censoring and the hazard ratio and the median survival numbers may change over time when we see the final analysis. But it's exciting to see. And the curves, the survival curves, continued to widen over time. So we hope that this is a true reflection of the power of a bispecific antibody that blocks both VEGF and PD-1. Now, it does come along with side effects. The VEGF antibodies are known to have side effects, and these are VEGF-related, typically proteinuria, that means protein spilling into your urine from the kidneys, as well as a risk of bleeding, a risk of hypertension, and then a very rare risk of clotting. And we did see overall increased treatment-related adverse events as well as serious adverse events that were treatment-related compared with the standard arm. But in general, the treatment-related deaths, though, were exactly the same. So, you know, ivonescimab did not increase the risk of death due to side effects. Now, when we look at the VEGF antibody and those side effects in general, the high-grade, or grade 3 and higher, side effects were relatively uncommon except for proteinuria that occurred in about 6% to 8% in grade 3 or higher. But you also have to pay attention to the grade 2 side effects, and the grade 2 side effects were present, and grade 2 side effects, even when they are anti-VEGF-related, then you do have to treat those. So it was important to understand that overall, in my take, you know, these are significant findings, but they are for a Chinese patient population. This study was only performed in China, and the Chinese patient population typically does better with all treatments that have been tested recently in general compared with a global patient population. So we have to take that in context. So my key takeaways were that this combination, ivonescimab plus chemotherapy, will be practice-changing for a squamous lung cancer patient population in China. Based on the interim survival results, we see adverse events that were mainly VEGF-related, and they were higher in the ivonescimab arm, and there is some uncertainty about how best to pick those patients for treatment and how those patients were enrolled. And then lastly, you know, how applicable will this be to our global lung cancer patient population? We need to await the global studies to resolve that.

Related Videos

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, PhD, FASCO, on Unresectable Embolization-Eligible HCC: Efficacy and Safety Data From EMERALD-3

Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, PhD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College at Cornell University, presents efficacy and safety data from the randomized phase III EMERALD-3 trial, which evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab with or without lenvatinib combined with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable embolization-eligible hepatocellular carcinoma (LBA4000).

Gastrointestinal Cancer
Gastroesophageal Cancer

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, FASCO, on Safety Results From DESTINY-Gastric03

Yelena Y. Janjigian, MD, FASCO, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, discusses safety results for DESTINY-Gastric03 Part 2 (arms D and F) and Part 4. The trial evaluated first-line fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki–based regimens in advanced HER2-expressing gastric cancer, gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal carcinoma (Abstract 4002).

Gynecologic Cancers

Krishnansu S. Tewari, MD, on Gynecologic Cancers: Expert Perspective on Major Data

Krishnansu S. Tewari, MD, of the University of California, Irvine, provides commentary on research presented in the oral abstract and rapid oral abstract sessions for gynecologic cancer, focusing on this year’s major trial data in endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancers. 

Prostate Cancer

Krishnan R. Patel, MD, on High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Clinico-Transcriptomic Risk Stratification

Krishnan R. Patel, MD, of the National Cancer Institute, discusses a combined analysis of the NRG/RTOG 9202, 9413, 9902, and 0521 trials that looked at using clinico-transcriptomic risk stratification to guide abiraterone treatment intensification among patients with high-risk prostate cancer (Abstract 5000).

Sarcoma

Mark A. Dickson, MD, on Advanced Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: SARC041 Trial

Mark A. Dickson, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, presents findings from SARC041, a phase III randomized double-blind study of abemaciclib vs placebo in patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma; patients who received abemaciclib experienced a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (Abstract LBA2).

Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement