Advertisement

Causes of Inferior Outcomes in AYAs With Leukemia


Advertisement
Get Permission

Julie A. Wolfson, MD, MSHS

Julie A. Wolfson, MD, MSHS

Despite survival gains for children diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), adolescents and young adults (AYAs)— those between the ages of 15 and 39— diagnosed with the disease have seen only modest improvements in survival. A study by Julie A. Wolfson, MD, MSHS, Assistant Professor and member of the Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship at the School of Medicine at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, and colleagues, in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention investigating the disparity in survival outcomes of AYAs diagnosed with ALL compared with children with ALL has found that lower clinical trial enrollment and shorter duration of treatment are associated with relapse after completing therapy.

The study highlights the importance of clinical trial participation and the completion of therapy, both in the consolidation and maintenance phases. The study also found that factors such as socioeconomic and insurance status contributed to relapse in AYA patients.

The study researchers assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with ALL diagnosed between ages 1 and 30 from 1990 to 2010, who had been diagnosed and/or treated at City of Hope in Duarte, California. The patient population consisted of 91 children (aged 1–14) and 93 AYAs (aged 15–39).

The researchers analyzed demographics from the patients’ medical records, including sex, age at diagnosis, race/ethnicity, insurance status, and socioeconomic status; whether the patients had been enrolled in a clinical trial; the duration of treatment; treatment approach; and oncology service, in which the researchers classified primary oncologists based on their treatment of patients on either pediatric or medical oncology services. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate relapse-free survival from diagnosis through relapse, death, or date of last contact.

The researchers found that AYAs experienced an increased risk of on-therapy relapse vs children (hazard ratio [HR] = 10.5, P = .004). In multivariable analysis restricted to AYAs, independent predictors of relapse included lack of clinical trial enrollment (HR = 2.6, P = .04) and nonwhite race/ethnicity (HR = 2.2, P = .05).

When compared with children, AYAs experienced an increased risk of relapse after completing therapy (HR = 7.7, P < .001). In multivariable analysis restricted to AYAs, longer therapy (months of maintenance: HR = 0.7, P < .001; months of consolidation: HR = 0.8, P = .03) protected against relapse.

“Among AYAs, aspects of health-care delivery (clinical trial enrollment, nonwhite race/ethnicity) are associated with relapse during therapy, and aspects of treatment (shorter duration of maintenance and consolidation) are associated with relapse after completing therapy,” concluded the study authors. ■

Wolfson JA, et al: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. October 27, 2018 (early release online).


Advertisement

Advertisement



;
Advertisement