Advertisement

ELCC 2018: Immunotherapy Provides Long-Term Survival Benefit for Patients With Lung Cancer

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Overall survival was significantly higher with atezolizumab at 2 and 3 years compared with docetaxel.
  • The long-term overall survival benefit with atezolizumab over docetaxel was observed across histology (squamous and nonsquamous) and regardless of PD-L1 expression.
  • The median duration of response was three times longer with atezolizumab (22.3 months) compared to docetaxel (7.2 months). Atezolizumab led to fewer adverse events than docetaxel.

Further evidence that immunotherapy provides long-term survival benefit for patients with lung cancer was presented by Mazières et al at the European Lung Cancer Congress (ELCC) in Geneva, Switzerland (Abstract 136PD_PR).

Researchers presented the 3-year survival results of the randomized phase II POPLAR trial in second line, which is the longest follow-up reported to date with anti–programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy in patients with previously treated, advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial randomized 287 patients from 61 sites across 13 countries with advanced NSCLC to the anti–PD-L1 antibody atezolizumab (Tecentriq) or the chemotherapy docetaxel.

Findings

Overall survival was significantly higher with atezolizumab at 2 and 3 years compared with docetaxel. Nearly one-third of patients (32.2%) in the atezolizumab treatment group were alive at 2 years compared with 16.6% in the docetaxel group. Additionally, at 3 years, almost twice as many patients (18.7%) were alive in the atezolizumab group compared to the docetaxel group (10.0%). The long-term overall survival benefit with atezolizumab over docetaxel was observed across histology (squamous and nonsquamous) and regardless of PD-L1 expression. Even patients with PD-L1 expression in less than 1% of tumor cells and less than 1% of immune cells had a promising rate of long-term survival.

The median duration of response was three times longer with atezolizumab (22.3 months) compared to docetaxel (7.2 months). Atezolizumab led to fewer adverse events than docetaxel.

Lead author Julien Mazières, MD, PhD, of Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France, said: “Nearly one in five patients treated with atezolizumab was alive at 3 years. This places atezolizumab among the drugs with the highest landmark overall survival in previously treated lung cancer patients.”

“The fact that all subgroups of patients benefitted to a similar degree is good in the sense that atezolizumab can be tried in all advanced NSCLC patients,” he continued. “On the other hand, it means that we cannot predict which patients are most likely to live for 3 years. We need to find biomarkers to help us identify the long-term survivors with the drug.”

Dr. Mazières said the drug was well tolerated. He said, “Some of my patients who were in the atezolizumab treatment group are now long-term survivors with lung cancer. They are not cured, but they have survived, have a good quality of life, and have returned to work. With immunotherapy, we now have a new type of patient: long-term survivors with lung cancer who can go back to a normal life.”

Commentary

Commenting on the study, Solange Peters, MD, PhD, Head of Medical Oncology at Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland, said, “Before immunotherapy, the long-term survival of NSCLC patients was close to 0%. POPLAR supports the concept that long-term survival is possible with immunotherapy. The 3-year survival results of POPLAR are consistent with the 3- and 5-year survival with the anti–PD-1 antibodies pembrolizumab [Keytruda] and nivolumab [Opdivo], respectively, in phase I trials. These latest results are exciting because unlike the previous two trials, POPLAR was a large, randomized trial and provides convincing proof that long-term survival now exists in lung cancer.”

Dr. Peters said there was now a strong argument that every patient with advanced NSCLC should receive immunotherapy. She said: “In the nivolumab phase I trial, 15% of patients were alive at 5 years, which in cancer is usually considered being cured. We should offer all patients this one in six chance of 5-year survival. However, this poses a financial challenge for health-care systems.”

To make this strategy sustainable, Dr. Peters said a method was needed to identify the patients who will not benefit from immunotherapy. She said, “That would enable us to treat only the patients with a high chance of long-term survival with immunotherapy. POPLAR shows that PD-L1 is not a useful biomarker to exclude patients from immunotherapy, since some patients with very low expression had an overall survival benefit. Rather than a single biomarker, I think it will be a signature of many biomarkers—including tumor mutation burden—that identifies the patients who should not be treated.”

Dr. Peters said trials are needed to assess the ability of a combination of biomarkers to predict which patients with advanced NSCLC do and do not survive long-term with immunotherapy. “These trials should be conducted in patients with similar characteristics to the long-term survivors in the phase I and II trials with atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab. So the first step will be to describe these patients in terms of demographics, smoking history, tumor mutation burden, expression of immune genes, and PD-L1 expression. Focusing future studies on these patients will help us to discover a biomarker signature for use in clinical practice.”

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement



Advertisement

By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.