Advertisement

Combined FISH and IHC Identifies Patients With NSCLC With Rare ALK Fusions That Respond to Crizotinib

Advertisement

Key Points

  • Fourteen cases with negative and atypical FISH demonstrated IHC positivity. Among them, 11 cases (0.35%) were ALK-negative via FISH and ALK-positive via IHC, and 3 cases (0.1%) were atypical FISH patterns and ALK-positive via IHC.
  • Targeted NGS analysis of all 14 cases revealed that 8 cases housed EML4-ALK fusions; 2 cases revealed novel ALK fusion partners (BIRC6 and PICALM); 1 case had a novel translocation partner (CEBPζ); and 3 patients did not exhibit any type of ALK fusions.
  • Among all 14 patients, 4 patients received crizotinib treatment and demonstrated partial responses at the end of follow-up.

The combined use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) identified non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with rare or novel anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, not otherwise identified by FISH alone, that showed response to crizotinib treatment. These findings were published by Li et al in the Journal of Thoracic Oncology.

ALK gene rearrangements are found in 3% to 5% of patients with NSCLC. It is routine clinical practice to screen patients with adenocarcinoma NSCLC for ALK rearrangements, due to the availability of ALK inhibitors and their ability to provide remarkable benefit to patients. FISH has long been the gold standard used to screen patients for ALK rearrangements. However, IHC platforms that are used to detect the overexpression of protein caused by ALK gene rearrangements have been found to be both highly sensitive and specific in determining ALK status in patients. Further, several studies have shown that patients with tumors that were ALK-negative via FISH were ALK-positive via IHC, and that those ALK-positive patients showed response when treated with crizotinib, an ALK inhibitor.

Study Findings

A group of investigators screened 3,128 NSCLC patients for ALK rearrangements using both FISH analysis and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Ventana-D5F3 IHC assay. Fourteen cases with atypical and negative FISH and positive IHC results were further investigated using targeted next-generation sequencing.

Results showed that of the 3,128 cases tested, 2,991 cases were subjected to both FISH and IHC analysis. Fourteen cases with negative and atypical FISH demonstrated IHC positivity.

Among them, 11 cases (11 of 2,991, 0.35%) were ALK-negative via FISH and ALK-positive via IHC, and 3 cases (3 of 2,991, 0.1%) were atypical FISH patterns and ALK-positive via IHC. Targeted next-generation sequencing analysis of all 14 cases revealed that 8 cases housed EML4-ALK fusions; 2 cases revealed novel ALK fusion partners (BIRC6 and PICALM); 1 case had a novel translocation partner (CEBPζ); and 3 patients did not exhibit any type of ALK fusions. Among all 14 patients, 4 patients received crizotinib treatment and demonstrated partial responses at the end of follow-up.

Conclusions

The authors commented that, “Identification of appropriate patient population with reliable detective methods is the key to NSCLC targeted therapies....The most valuable finding of our study was that patients with EML4-ALK fusion or other novel complicated rearrangements could test negative via FISH and positive via IHC, and these patients could possibly benefit from ALK-targeted therapy. Based on these findings, combinational assay of FISH and IHC methods are highly recommended in routine pathological diagnosis and when negative and atypical FISH patterns are accompanied by positivity in IHC.”

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement