Advertisement

SABCS 2015: Mastectomy Plus Reconstruction Has Higher Complication Rates and Costs Than Lumpectomy Plus Radiation

Advertisement

Key Points

  • The risk of complications for younger women was 30% for lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, 45% for lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, 25% for mastectomy alone, and 56% for mastectomy plus reconstruction.
  • The risk of complications for older women were 38% for lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, 51% for lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, 37% for mastectomy alone, 69% for mastectomy plus reconstruction, and 31% for lumpectomy alone.
  • Risk of complications from mastectomy plus reconstruction was two times higher than that from lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation for both younger and older women, after adjusting for other differences in patients and how they were treated. 

Among the various guideline-concordant local therapy options available for women with early-stage breast cancer in the United States, mastectomy plus reconstruction had the highest complication rates and complication-related costs for both younger women with private insurance and older women on Medicare and was the most expensive option for younger women, according to data presented at the 2015 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, held December 8–12 in San Antonio, Texas (Abstract S3-07).

“Women with early-stage breast cancer have several local therapy options. Although there’s nuance as far as what treatment is best for which patient, there is a large group of patients for whom most, if not all, of these treatment options are considered guideline-appropriate,” said Benjamin D. Smith, MD, Associate Professor and Research Director of the Breast Radiation Oncology Section in the Department of Radiation Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Treatment Options

Current guideline-concordant local therapy options for women with early-stage breast cancer include lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, mastectomy without reconstruction or radiation, mastectomy with reconstruction without radiation, and lumpectomy without radiation.

“We really don’t have a good framework to help patients understand what the experience with mastectomy and reconstruction will be, compared with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation, and what the trade-offs are between these different treatments with regard to side effects, cost to patients, and cost to their insurance company. To me, it seemed like a black box,” Dr. Smith added.

“Mastectomy and reconstruction rates have been increasing in the United States in the past decade, and I think ours is the first study to quantify the harm associated with choosing this procedure as opposed to simpler options,” Dr. Smith said.

Study Details

Dr. Smith and colleagues used two data sources to gather information on treatment costs: the MarketScan database, a commercially available database on insurance claims from employers that they used to gather data on younger women, and the SEER-Medicare database, which they used to collect data on older women.

The investigators collected information on women who were diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in 2000 through 2011 and had complete insurance coverage for 1 year before and 2 years after diagnosis. Complications from therapy within 2 years of diagnosis, including wound, local infection, seroma or hematoma, fat necrosis, breast pain, pneumonitis, rib fracture, graft failure, and implant removal were identified using diagnosis and procedure codes, and complication-related costs and total costs were calculated.

Study Findings

Based on data gathered from 44,344 patients from the MarketScan cohort, the risk of complications for younger women was 30% for lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, 45% for lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, 25% for mastectomy alone, and 56% for mastectomy plus reconstruction.

For older women from the SEER-Medicare cohort of 60,867 patients, the risk of complications was 38% for lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation, 51% for lumpectomy plus brachytherapy, 37% for mastectomy alone, 69% for mastectomy plus reconstruction, and 31% for lumpectomy alone.

Risk of complications from mastectomy plus reconstruction was two times higher than that from lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation for both younger and older women, after adjusting for other differences in patients and how they were treated.

Complication-related costs were $8,608 higher with mastectomy plus reconstruction than with lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation for younger women with private insurance and $2,568 higher for older women with Medicare.

The most expensive therapy (procedure cost plus complication costs) for younger women was mastectomy plus reconstruction, with an average cost of $89,140, which was $23,421 more than lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation. For Medicare patients, lumpectomy plus brachytherapy and mastectomy plus reconstruction were the two most expensive therapies, costing $37,741 and $36,166, respectively, while the cost of lumpectomy plus whole-breast irradiation was $34,097.

“When oncologists offer all appropriate therapy options to patients, some women may choose to avoid radiation and opt for mastectomy and reconstruction instead. This study is helpful to such patients because it provides them with information regarding the trade-offs involved in this choice,” Dr. Smith said. “Our study findings are also particularly relevant from a payer’s perspective, given the growing emphasis placed on promoting treatments that are effective, safe, and cost-conscious.”

This study was supported by grants from the Department of Health Services, Varian Medical Systems, and the Duncan Family Foundation. Dr. Smith declared no conflicts of interest. 

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.


Advertisement

Advertisement




Advertisement