2018 ASTRO: Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in 'Good-Risk' DCIS


Key Points

  • After 12 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 2.8% for those in the WBRT arm and 11.4% for those in the observation arm.
  • The 12-year cumulative incidence of invasive local recurrence was 1.5% for those in the WBRT arm and 5.8% for those who did not receive radiation.
  • In multivariate analysis, only those who received both WBRT and tamoxifen experienced reduced local recurrence.

A subset of patients with low-risk breast cancer is highly unlikely to see cancer return following breast conservation surgery, but can lower that risk even further with radiation therapy, finds a new long-term clinical trial report. These 12-year follow-up data from the only prospective, randomized trial to compare recurrence outcomes after treatment for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were presented by McCormick et al at the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) (Abstract LBA1).

In this long-term update, patients with “good-risk” DCIS — defined by the research team as cancer found only on mammogram or incidentally during a breast biopsy for another reason, with size ≤ 2.5 cm, final margins ≥ 3 mm, with low or intermediate nuclear grade—continued to experience extremely low recurrence 12 years after breast conservation surgery. Those who underwent whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) and those who also opted to take tamoxifen experienced the lowest recurrence rates, but even those who received no further treatment following surgery did not experience any life-threatening consequences

“I think the most surprising thing was that the recurrence rate in patients randomized to receive radiation therapy was so low. Radiation reduced recurrence by more than 70%, and this was a much more profound impact than we expected,” said Beryl McCormick, MD, FASTRO, lead investigator of the NRG Oncology/RTOG multicenter trial, Chief of the External Beam Radiotherapy Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, and Professor of Radiation Oncology at Weill Cornell, in a statement.

Since none of the tumors that recurred in either group appeared to pose a life-threatening risk, however, Dr. McCormick said it was reasonable for patients to determine, in consultation with their physician, whether continued treatment following surgery was something they wanted to do.

“Not all DCIS is the same,” said Dr. McCormick. “This type of cancer will not impact life expectancy. We found that radiation does significantly reduce the risk for recurrence, but you are starting with an extremely low recurrence rate even without radiation. Therefore, there should be a meaningful discussion between patient and doctor about whether additional treatment is something the patient wishes to pursue.”

The current standard of care for DCIS—defined by an ASTRO/ASCO/Society of Surgical Oncology Consensus Guideline—includes lumpectomy to remove the tumor in combination with radiation therapy to reduce the likelihood that the cancer will return.

Initial Results

From 1999 to 2006, 636 patients were randomly assigned to receive WBRT with standard doses or to an observation arm. The use of tamoxifen for 5 years was optional. Initial results, including 7 years of follow-up, were reported in 2013 and later published by McCormick et al in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

New Findings

The new analyses include long-term follow-up data for 629 patients whose median age was 58 years, including 76% postmenopausal women. Mean pathologic tumor size was 0.60 cm (61% 0.5 cm or smaller, 65% with a margin width of 1.0 cm or larger or a completely negative re-excision specimen). The highest nuclear tumor grade was 1, found in 44% of patients; grade 2 tumors were diagnosed in the remaining 56%. Tamoxifen was used by 58% of patients on the WBRT arm and 65% of those on the observation arm (P = .05).

Median follow-up time was 12.4 years. After 12 years, the cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 2.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1–5.6) for those in the WBRT arm and 11.4% (7.7–15.8) for those in the observation arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.13–0.54; P = .0001). The 12-year cumulative incidence of invasive local recurrence was 1.5% (95% CI = 0.4–4.0) for those in the WBRT arm and 5.8% (3.2–9.5) for those who did not receive radiation (HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14–0.85; P = .016).

In multivariate analysis, only those who received both WBRT (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.12–0.53; P = .0003) and tamoxifen (HR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.27–0.91; P = .024) experienced reduced local recurrence. Neither age nor pathologic tumor size were significant for predicting local recurrence or invasive local recurrence. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for overall survival, disease-free survival, or mastectomy use.

During the additional 5 years following surgery, noted Dr. McCormick, “there was a slight creeping up of local recurrence rate.” For those who received WBRT, the rate increased by just under 1%, bringing it to nearly 3% postsurgery. For those who did not receive radiation, the recurrence rate increased by one percentage point each additional year of follow-up, climbing from just under 7% to just under 12% after 12 years.
These results “should inform a meaningful patient-physician discussion that includes risks, benefits, and the patient’s own degree of comfort,” Dr. McCormick concluded.

“All of us have a different definition of what is an acceptable risk,” she said. “Some patients with DCIS will still want radiation therapy. But for others, the risk is so low they may opt not to treat, and that should be considered a viable option.”

The content in this post has not been reviewed by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. (ASCO®) and does not necessarily reflect the ideas and opinions of ASCO®.




By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and agree to our use of cookies to identify you for marketing. Read our Privacy Policy to learn more.